Feeds:
Posts
Comments

26. Resolved, To cast away such things as I find do abate my assurance.

27. Resolved, Never willfully to omit any thing, except the omission be for the glory of God; and frequently to examine my omissions.

28. Resolved, To study the Scriptures so steadily, constantly, and frequently, as that I may find, and plainly perceive, myself to grow in the knowledge of the same.

29. Resolved, Never to count that a prayer, nor to let that pass as a prayer, nor that as a petition of a prayer, which is so made, that I cannot hope that God will answer it; nor that as a confession which I cannot hope God will accept.

30. Resolved, To strive every week to be brought higher in religion, and to a higher exercise of grace, than I was the week before.

52. I frequently hear persons in old age say how they would live, if they were to live their lives over again: Resolved, That I will live just so as I can think I shall wish I had done, supposing I live to old age. July 8, 1723.

53. Resolved, To improve every opportunity, when I am in the best and happiest frame of mind, to cast and venture my soul on the Lord Jesus Christ, to trust and confide in him, and consecrate myself wholly to him; that from this I may have assurance of my safety, knowing that I confide in my Redeemer. July 8, 1723.

Assurance in Conversion

“In consequence of this, I felt a strong desire to be alone with God, to go to him, without having any one to interrupt the silent and soft communion, which I earnestly desired between God and my own soul; and accordingly withdrew to my chamber. It should have been mentioned that, before I retired, while Mr. Reynolds was praying, these words, in Romans 8:34, came into my mind, ‘Who is he that condemneth; it is Christ that died, yea rather that is risen again, who is even at the right hand of God, who also maketh intercession for us;’ as well as the following words, ‘Who shall separate us from the love of Christ,’ etc.; which occasioned great sweetness and delight in my soul. But when I was alone, the words came to my mind with far greater power and sweetness; upon which I took the Bible, and read the words to the end of the chapter, when they were impressed on my heart with vastly greater power and sweetness still. They appeared to me with undoubted certainty as the words of God, and as words which God did pronounce concerning me. I had no more doubt of it, than I had of my being. I seemed as it were to hear the great God proclaiming thus to the world concerning me; ‘Who shall lay any thing to thy charge,’ &-c.; and had it strongly impressed on me, how impossible it was for anything in heaven or earth, in this world or the future, ever to separate me from the love of God which was in Christ Jesus.

I cannot find language to express, how certain this appeared — the everlasting mountains and hills were but shadows to it. My safety, and happiness, and eternal enjoyment of God’s immutable love, seemed as durable and unchangeable as God himself. Melted and overcome by the sweetness of this assurance, I fell into a great flow of tears, and could not forbear weeping aloud. It appeared certain to me that God was my Father, and Christ my Lord and Savior, that he was mine and I his. Under a delightful sense of the immediate presence and love of God, these words seemed to come over and over in my mind, ‘My God, my all; my God, my all.’ The presence of God was so near, and so real, that I seemed scarcely conscious of any thing else. God the Father, and the Lord Jesus Christ, seemed as distinct persons, both manifesting their inconceivable loveliness, and mildness, and gentleness, and their great and immutable love to me. I seemed to be taken under the care and charge of my God and Savior, in an inexpressibly endearing manner; and Christ appeared to me as a mighty Savior, under the character of the Lion of the tribe of Judah, taking my heart, with all its corruptions, under his care, and putting it at his feet. In all things, which concerned me, I felt myself safe under the protection of the Father and the Savior; who appeared with supreme kindness to keep a record of every thing that I did, and of every thing that was done to me, purely for my good.

The following is a collection of various insights by Jonathan Edwards on Assurance of Salvation and on the Perseverance of the Saints. The Miscellanies are BOOKMARKED for easier reference (if you have MS Word or the PDF Reader).

Concerning the Perseverance of the Saints

CONCERNING THE RIGHTEOUS MAN FALLING AWAY

With respect to those texts in Ezekiel — that speak of a righteous man’s falling away from his righteousness — the doctrine of perseverance was not so fully revealed under that dispensation. It was of service to the godly to make them wary; but especially to those who were legally righteous, and trusted in their own righteousness — the doctrine of perseverance was not so fully revealed under that dispensation. It was of service to the godly to make them wary; but especially to those who were legally righteous, and trusted in their own righteousness, as Ezekiel’s hearers did; to convince them of this, that there was a connection between the antecedent, falling away, and the consequent, the dying in their iniquity. Jer. 32:39, 40, “And I will give them one heart and one way, that they may fear me for ever, for the good of them, and of their children after them; and I will make an everlasting covenant with them, that I will not turn away from them, to do them good; but I will put my fear in their hearts, that they shall not depart from me.” And it is so spoken of once and again by this very prophet, Eze. 11:17-21. and chap. 36:24-29; yea, in this very chapter, after he had been declaring the danger of falling away from righteousness, the children of Israel seem to be exhorted to this very thing as a remedy against falling away; Eze. 18:31, “Cast away from you all your transgressions, whereby ye have transgressed, and make you a new heart and a new spirit; for why will ye die, O house of Israel?” They needed not only to turn from their transgressions, but to cast them away utterly, to have finally done with them, and to make them a new heart; for the prophet declares, that their old heart was a backsliding heart, bent to backslide, as the prophet often complains.

The godly themselves were really exposed to die in their iniquity, i.e. they were liable to be destroyed by God’s awful judgments in this world. The prophet has a special eye to those destroying judgments that God had lately brought on the nation of the Jews, which are very much the subject of the prophecy, and seem to have given occasion for it, and which the Jews had respect to in the proverb which they used, and which gave occasion to what is said in this chapter. If the sinner turned from his outward wickedness, unto an outward righteousness only, he would save his soul alive with regard to those outward calamities; and if the righteous fell away outwardly by committing some grievous sin, and getting into a bad way, they exposed themselves to die by this their iniquity in this manner.

That there is a real difference between them that fall away, and them that persevere, even before they fall away, is evident by the things that are given as a reason of their falling away: because they have no root in themselves; because they have not counted the cost, and because they have no oil in their vessels. Those that have no root, differ from those who have root, before there be the effect of their having no root: and so those that have no oil. And it appears again, by what is said, John 2:23, that “when Christ was at Jerusalem at the passover, on the feast day, many believed in his name, when they saw the miracles which he did. But Jesus did not commit himself unto them, because he knew all men, and needed not that any should testify of man: for he knew what was in man.” And so, “They went out from us, because they were not of us. If they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us.”

Objection 1. But it is in the same chapter said, “That if a wicked man turn from his wickedness and do that which is lawful and right, he shall live:” where doubtless must be understood by “doing that which is lawful and right,” sincere and gracious righteousness, because there is a promise of life. And we must doubtless understand doing that which is lawful and right,” sincere and gracious righteousness, because there is a promise of life. And we must doubtless understand doing that which is lawful and right here, in the same sense as before. Answer. We may understand it in the same sense, for an external, visible, material righteousness. When it is said, if he turn from his iniquity and do that which is lawful and right, it must be understood, if he continue so to do, and do not turn from it again. According to the schemes of both Arminians and Calvinists, this must be understood. Whereby the objection is overthrown.

Visible Christians are in Scripture called saints, or holy; which is equivalent to the calling them righteous. The Jews are called an holy nation; the land is a land of uprightness; when only visibility is intended. — By righteous, sometimes is meant only innocent, or materially righteous in some particular. “Wilt thou also destroy a righteous nation?” Gen. 20:4; Exo. 23:7. The innocent and the righteous, slay thou not:” Deu. 25:1, “Ye shall justify the righteous, and condemn the wicked:” 1 Sam. 4:11, “how much more, when wicked men have slain a righteous person?” 2 Kin. 10:9. By the righteous man that the prophet Ezekiel speaks of, he certainly does not speak in so limited a sense as to mean those that are of perfect and upright hearts, but so as to include those of an unsound heart, that trust in their own righteousness to commit iniquity; see Eze. 33:13. i.e. those whose motive is only self-love, and their own safety, and so trust that they have righteousness enough to render them safe, though they do commit sin. Those that are only restrained from committing sin by fear, and are ready to embrace, and are glad of opportunities of committing sin with impunity; these cannot be such as the sincerely righteous are often described to be, viz. such as love God with all their hearts and souls; that love the way of his commandments; that choose the way of his commands, etc. The reason why some do not persevere, is, that there is not now a right heart in them; as is evident by Deu. 5:29, “O that there were such an heart in them, that they would fear me and keep my commandments!” etc.

When it is said, “If a righteous man turn from his righteousness, and commit iniquity, his righteousness shall not be remembered, but he shall die in his iniquity;” we need not, according to the scripture manner of expression, understand anything, but his seeming righteousness, or the righteousness that he seemeth to have. Christ has often such an aphorism as this, “Whosoever hath, to him shall be given, and he shall have more abundance; but whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken away even that he hath;” which he applies to that apparent godliness, grace, or piety, which natural men have, as is evident by the contexts, and the occasions of his using this aphorism; as Mat. 13:12, and Mat. 25:29, and Mark 4:25. This, in another place, is explained thus, “Whosoever hath, to him shall be given; and whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken even that which he seemeth to have;” Luke 8:18. Being a righteous man, does indeed commonly signify to be one that is truly and sincerely godly. And so is believing in Christ mentioned frequently as the distinguishing character of one that is truly Christ’s disciple. Yet we read of some that are said to believe, who, even at that very time, are spoken of as wanting something necessary to make them true disciples: John 2:23, 24, 25, “Now when he was in Jerusalem at the passover, in the feast day, many believed in his name, when they saw the miracles which he did. But Jesus did not commit himself to them, because he knew all men; and needed not that any should testify of men, for he knew what was in man.” These words intimate, that though they believed, yet Christ knew that they had not that in them then, that was to be depended on for perseverance: which implies, that if they were true believers, of a right principle, their perseverance might be depended on. And we are elsewhere told, why some that believe, endure but for a while, and do not persevere, viz. because they have no root in themselves.

That there is an essential difference between the faith and seeming grace of such professors as fall away, and such as persevere, even before any distinction appears as to perseverance, or while both retain their religion, is exceedingly manifest by John 6:64, 65, “But there are some of you that believe not. For Jesus knew from the beginning who they were that believed not, and who should betray him. And he said, Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.” And John 6:70, “And Jesus answered them, Have not I chosen you twelve, and one of you is a devil?” Here, before Judas had fallen away, he is said not to believe, and to be a devil. Now Judas was a professing disciple and a distinguished one. He was a visible believer. Christ speaks of him as one that had forsaken all and followed him in the regeneration, as is evident in Mat. 19:27, 28.; and as one that had continued with Christ in his temptations, Luke 22:28. — compared with verse 30. There were great appearances of true grace in him, as there were in Ahitophel, his type, with whom David took sweet counsel, etc. And therefore, as a righteous man, Christ had given him the extraordinary gifts of the Holy Ghost, and sent him forth to preach the gospel, and heal the sick, and cast out devils. — yet he, even before he fell away, is said not to believe, but to be then a devil; which is agreeable to what the apostle says of apostates, “They went out from us, because they were not of us. If they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us.”

That they who once truly believe in Christ, never fall away finally and perish, is evident, because they that now believe not, and are in a state of condemnation, are spoken of as those that never have believed, John 3:18, “Because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.” Which supposes, that none of those that have believed, are now unbelievers, or are now in a state of condemnation. So again, those who shall be condemned at the day of judgment, are represented as those, not only whom Christ then will know not, but as those whom he never knew, Mat. 7:23. But how can this be a true representation, if some of them were once true Christians, and so were known and owned by Christ, but only have since apostatized? “When St. Paul kept under his body lest he should be a castaway, 1 Cor. 9:27, he did no otherwise than he was wont to do in temporal concerns, in cases wherein he was beforehand certain of the event. So he sent word to the chief captain of the Jews lying in wait to kill him, lest he should be murdered by them, though it was revealed to him from God, but the very night before, that he should live to see Rome; Acts 23:12-21. So he would not allow the sailors to leave the ship.” etc. Bellamy’s True Religion, Disc. 1. Inference 9. 1 John 3:6, “Whosoever sinneth, hath not seen him, neither known him.” This could not be true, if a man who has truly seen him, and known him, might finally fall away to sin.

As to scripture cautions against falling away, lest it should issue in damnation; we may observe that God had been pleased to connect eternal life with eating the fruit of the tree of life; and therefore, although it was utterly impossible that Adam should have eternal life in himself, after he had fallen, as God’s peremptory declaration and unalterable constitution had made it impossible; yet we are told, that after the fall, God placed cherubims and a flaming sword to keep the way of the tree of life, lest the man should put forth his hand, and take and eat of the fruit of the tree, and live forever. So God has connected damnation with living in allowed sin, and being overcome by sin, and brought under its power. And therefore, although it be impossible, that men, after they are once truly converted, should ever perish, yet they are warned against falling away and yielding to the power of sin, lest they should perish: and the apostle Paul kept under his body, lest he should be a cast-away.

Objection 2. As to objections from such hypothetical propositions as those, Heb. 10:27, etc. “if we sin willfully, after we have received the knowledge of the truth.” Heb. 6:4, etc. “For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, if they fall away,” etc. Such hypothetical propositions may be true, when one or both parts of it are impossible, as the truth of such a proposition consists in the connection of the antecedent and consequent; as when our Lord said to the Jews, “If I should say, I know him not, I should be a liar like unto you.” See Gill against Whitby, vol. 1 page 271.

Objection 3. That we are required to TAKE CARE and to PRAY that we may persevere. It was impossible for Christ to fail under his trials; and yet how evident is it that he used means, endeavors, care, labor, and earnest prayers, that he might persevere? — In order to show, that an absolute promise of perseverance does consist with counsels and exhortations to endeavor, and care to persevere, I would lay down the following positions.

Position 1. What is proper for us to seek by earnest and importunate prayer, it is proper for us to use means, labor, and care, for that end. The reason is plain: prayer is one kind of seeking the thing; it is using means, and one way of laboring for it, taking care to obtain it, and pursuing after it. There are many instances of prayer, and commands to pray, for things promised. Christ on earth prayed for things promised; and he continually intercedes in heaven for things promised.

Position 2. What it is proper that persons should use endeavors, means, and care for, they are properly exhorted to use those means and endeavors.

Position 3. That which it is proper for another to use means, labours, and care for, that he may obtain it, thought he knows it is certainly promised, it is proper that we should use means, 7c. to obtain for ourselves, though it is promised. But Christ used means, endeavors, labor, etc. for the salvation of sincerely good men, though it be promised. He labored, took care, denied himself, and suffered for the salvation of sincerely good men; which yet had been before abundantly promised to him, and promised to men in the Old Testament; and Christ himself had promised it. The Scripture represents, that Christ ran a race to win a prize, and endured the cross for the joy that was set before him.

If it were left to the freedom of men’s own will, whether men should persevere, in the sense that the Arminians suppose; i.e. to a will not determined by God, but self-determined, then it would be absurd to pray to God that we may persevere; that he would keep us from falling, and that he would uphold our goings in his paths, etc.

84. Perseverance. There is just the same reason for those commands of earnest care and laborious endeavors for perseverance, and threatenings of defection, notwithstanding its being certain that all that have true grace shall persevere, as there is for earnest endeavors after godliness, and to make our calling and election sure, notwithstanding all that are elected shall undoubtedly be saved. For as the case with respect to this is the same, decree or not decree, everyone that believes shall be saved, and he that believes not shall be damned. They that will not live godly lives, find out for themselves that they are not elected. They that will live godly lives have found out for themselves that they are elected. So it is here: he that to his utmost endeavors to persevere in ways of obedience, finds out that his obedience and righteousness are true, and he that does not, discovers that his is false. In this respect, it is all one whether he that is once righteous must be always so or no. There is not at all the less diligence necessary for that, yea necessary in order to salvation.

327b. Assuring Grace. If grace implanted in the heart be not an infallible sign that a man shall have eternal life, how is the Spirit of God an earnest of glory? When a man may have the Spirit, and yet have no assurance that he shall be glorified. For everyone who has the grace of God implanted in his heart, has the Holy Spirit of God in his sanctifying influences.

415. Perseverance. Assurance. As persons are commanded and counseled to repent and be converted, though it is already determined whether they shall be converted or no; after the same manner and with the same propriety, persons are commanded and counseled to persevere, although by their being already converted, it is certain they shall persevere. By their resolutely and steadfastly persevering through all difficulties, opposition, and trials, they obtain an evidence of the truth and soundness of their conversion, and by their unstableness and backsliding, they procure an evidence of their unsoundness and hypocrisy. And it always happens that persons who have the most need of being cautioned and counseled against falling and apostasy, by reason of the weakness of their grace, have most need of an evidence of the truth of their grace. And those who have the least need of any evidence, by reason of the strength and lively exercise of grace, have least need of being warned against falling, they being least in danger of it. And so the same persons, when they are most in danger of falling — by reason of the languishing of their graces, their ill-temper and workings of corruption — have most need of evidence, and when in least need of care and watchfulness not to fall, by reason of the strength and vigorous actings of grace, they have least need of evidence. So that there is as much need of persons exercising care and diligence to persevere in order to their salvation, as there is as of their attention and care to repent and be converted. For our own care and diligence is as much the proper and decreed means of perseverance, as of anything else. And the want of perseverance is as much an evidence of the want of true conversion, as the want of conversion is a sign of the want of election. Labor and diligence to persevere is as rational a way to make sure of the truth of grace, as they are to make sure of the truth of election. God’s wrath and future punishment are proposed to all sorts of men, as motives to an universal and constant obedience, not only to the wicked, but also to the godly. Indeed, those that have obtained full assurance of their safe estate, are not capable of this motive, and they have no need of it. But when persons are most capable of the fear of hell, through their want of assurance — and their uncertainty, whether or no they are not exposed to damnation — by reason of the weakness of their grace, then they have most need of caution.

Corollary. — Here we may observe that it is not the scripture way of judging of the truth of grace, to be determined principally by the method and steps of the first work, but by the exercise and fruits of grace in a holy life.

428. Perseverance in faith is, in one sense, the condition of justification: that is, the promise of acceptance is made only to a persevering sort of faith, and the proper evidence of its being of that sort is actual perseverance. Not but that a man may have good evidences that his faith is of that sort, before he has finished his perseverance, yea, the first time that he exercises such a faith, if the exercises of it are lively and vigorous. But when the believer has those vigorous exercises of faith, by which he has clear evidences of its being of a persevering kind, he evermore feels most disposition and resolution to persevere, and most of a spirit of dependence upon God and Christ to enable him so to do.

467. Perseverance. As to passages of Scripture like that, Eze. 18:24, wherein are declared the fatal consequences of turning or falling away from righteousness, they do not at all argue but that there is an essential difference, in the very nature of the righteousness of those that persevere, and the righteousness of those that fall away. The one is of a lasting sort, the other not. And so falling away or holding out are in those places respected as natural fruits or discoveries of the nature of the righteous or of the wicked. If a man that had a prospect of being erelong in calamitous circumstances (of being poor and the object of general contempt), and should make this declaration concerning his friend or him that now appeared to be such, that if his friend would cleave to him through all his circumstances, he would receive him and treat him ever after as his true friend, but otherwise he would utterly desert him as a false friend: — this would not argue that he thought there was no difference between the love of friendship that was persevering and that which fails when it is tried, but only that those difficulties discover the difference and show whose love is of a lasting sort, and whose not. The promises in Scripture are commonly made to the signs of grace, though God knows whether men be sincere or not, without the signs whereby men know it.

695. Perseverance. Covenant of Grace. The following are some reasons why grace to persevere is promised in the covenant of grace.

1. God, when he had laid out himself to glorify his mercy and grace in the redemption of poor fallen men, did not see meet that those who are redeemed by Christ should be redeemed so imperfectly, as still to have the work of perseverance left in their own hands. They had been found already insufficient for this even in their perfect state, and are now ten times more liable than formerly to fall away and not to persevere, if in their fallen broken state, with their imperfect sanctification, the care of the matter be trusted with them. Man, though redeemed by Christ so as to have the Holy Spirit of God, and spiritual life again restored in a degree, yet is left a poor, piteous creature, because all is suspended on his perseverance as it was at first. And the care of that affair is left with him as it was then, and he is ten times more likely to fall away than he was then, if we consider only what he was in himself to preserve him from it. The poor creature sees his own insufficiency to stand, from what has happened in time past. His own instability has been his undoing already, and now he is vastly more unstable than before. The great thing wherein the first covenant was deficient was that the fulfillment of the righteousness of the covenant, and man’s perseverance, was entrusted with man himself, with nothing better to secure it than his own strength. And therefore, God introduces a better, which should be an everlasting covenant, a new and living way, wherein that which was wanting in the first should be supplied, and a remedy should be provided against that, which under the first covenant proved man’s undoing, viz. man’s own weakness and instability, by a Mediator being given, who is the same yesterday, today, and forever: who cannot fail, who should undertake for his people and take care of them. He is able to save to the uttermost all that come unto God through him, and ever lives to make intercession for them. God did not see it fit that man should be trusted to stand in his own strength a second time. It is not fit that in a covenant of grace, wherein all is of mere, free, and absolute grace, that the reward of life should be suspended on the perseverance of man, as dependent on the strength and stedfastness of his own will. It is a covenant of works, and not a covenant of grace that suspends eternal life on what is the fruit of a man’s own strength. Eternal life was to have been of works in those two respects, viz. as it was to have been for man’s own righteousness, and as it was suspended on the fruit of his own strength. For though our first parent depended on the grace of God, the influence of his Spirit in his heart, yet that grace was given him already, and dwelt in him constantly, and without interruption, in such a degree as to hold him above any lust or sinful habit or principle. Eternal life was not merely suspended on that grace that was given him, and dwelt in him, but on his improvement of that grace which he already had. For in order to his perseverance, there was nothing further promised beyond his own strength, no extraordinary occasional assistance was promised. It was not promised but that man should be left to himself as he was. But the new covenant is of grace, in a manner distinguishing from the old, in both these respects, that the reward of life is suspended neither on his own strength nor worthiness. It provides something above either. But if eternal life under the new covenant was suspended on man’s own perseverance, or his perseveringly using diligent endeavors to stand without the promise of anything farther to ascertain it than his own strength, it would herein be farther from being worthy to be called a covenant of grace than the first covenant, because man’s strength is exceedingly less than it was then, and he is under far less advantages to persevere. And if he should obtain eternal life by perseverance in his own strength now, eternal life would, with respect to that, be much more of himself than it would have been by the first covenant, because perseverance now would be a much greater thing than under those circumstances. And he has but an exceeding small part of that grace dwelling in him, to assist him, that he had then, and that which he has, does not dwell in him in the exercise of it by such a constant law as grace did then, but is put into exercise by the spirit of grace, in a far more arbitrary and sovereign way.

2. Again, Christ came into the world to do that in which mere men failed. He came as a better surety, and that in him those defects might be supplied, which proved to be in our first surety, and that we might have a remedy for the mischief that came by those defects. But the defect of our first surety was that he did not persevere. He wanted steadfastness, and therefore God sent us, in the next surety, one that could not fail, but should surely persevere. But this is no supply of that defect to us, if the reward of life be still suspended on perseverance, which has nothing, as to ourselves, greater to secure it still, than the strength of mere man. And the perseverance of our second surety is no remedy against the like mischief, which came by failure of our first surety. But on the contrary, we are much more exposed to the mischief than before. The perseverance on which life was suspended, depended then indeed on the strength of mere man, but now (on the supposition) it would be suspended on the strength of fallen man.

In that our first surety did not persevere, we fell in and with him, for doubtless, if he had stood, we should have stood with him. And therefore when God in mercy has given us a better surety to supply the defects of the first, a surety that might stand and persevere, and one that has actually persevered through the greatest imaginable trials, then doubtless we shall stand and persevere in him. After all this, eternal life will not be suspended on our perseverance by our own poor, feeble, broken strength. Our first surety, if he had stood, would have been brought to eat of the tree of life, as a seal of a confirmed state of life in persevering and everlasting holiness and happiness, and he would have eat of this tree of life as a seal of persevering confirmed life, not only for himself, but as our head. As when he eat of the tree of knowledge of good and evil, he tasted as our head, and so brought death on himself and all his posterity. So if he had persevered and had eat of the tree of life, he would have tasted of that as our head, and therein life and confirmed holiness would have been sealed to him and all his posterity. But Christ, the second Adam, acts the same part for us that the first Adam was to have done, but failed. He has fulfilled the law, and has been admitted to the seals of confirmed and everlasting life. God, as a testimony and seal of his acceptance of what he had done as the condition of life, raised him from the dead, and exalted him with his own right hand, received him up into glory, and gave all things into his hands. Thus the second Adam has persevered, not only for himself, but for us, and has been sealed to confirmed and persevering and eternal life, as our head: so that all those that are his, and who are his spiritual posterity, are sealed in him to persevering life. Here it will be in vain to object that persons’ persevering in faith and holiness is the condition of their being admitted to the state of Christ’s posterity, or to a right in him, and that none are admitted as such till they have first persevered. For this is as much as to say that Christ has no church in this world, and that there are none on this side the grave admitted as his children or people, because they have not yet actually persevered to the end of life, which is the condition of their being admitted as his children and people, which is contrary to the whole Scripture.

Christ having finished the work of Adam for us, does more than merely to bring us back to the probationary state of Adam, while he had yet his work to finish, knowing his eternal life uncertain, because suspended on his uncertain perseverance. That alone is inconsistent with Christ’s being a second Adam. For if Christ, succeeding in Adam’s room, has done and gone through the work that Adam was to have done, and did this as our representative or surety, he has not thereby set us only in Adam’s probationary, uncertain state, but has carried us, who are in him, and are represented by him, through Adam’s working probationary state, unto that confirmed state that Adam should have arrived at, if he had gone through his own work.

3. That the saints shall surely persevere, will necessarily follow from this, that they have already performed the obedience which is the righteousness by which they have justification unto life (or it is already performed for them and imputed to them), for that supposes that it is the same thing in the sight of God as if they had performed it. Now when the creature has once actually performed and finished the righteousness of the law, he is immediately sealed and confirmed to eternal life. There is nothing to keep him off from the tree of life. But as soon as ever a believer has Christ’s righteousness imputed to him, he has virtually finished the righteousness of the law.

To suppose that a right to life is suspended on our own perseverance, which is uncertain, and has nothing more sure and stedfast to secure it than our own good-wills and resolutions (which way soever we suppose it to be dependent on the strength of our resolutions and wills, either with assistance, or in the improvement of assistance, or in seeking assistance), is exceedingly dissonant to the nature and design of the gospel scheme. For if it were so, it would unavoidably deprive the believer of the comfort, hope, and joy of salvation: which would be very contrary to God’s design in the scheme of man’s salvation, which is to make the ground of our peace and joy in all respects strong and sure. Or else, he must depend much on himself, and the ground of his joy and hope must in a great measure be his own strength, and the stedfastness of his own heart, the unchangeableness of his own resolutions, etc., which would be very different from the gospel scheme.

711. Perseverance of the Saints. It is evident the saints shall persevere, because they are already justified. Adam would not have been justified till he had fulfilled and done his work, and then his justification would have been a confirmation. It would have been an approving of him as having done his work, and as standing entitled to his reward. A servant that is sent out about a work is not justified by his master till he has done, and then the master views the work, and seeing it to be done according to his order, he then approves and justifies him as having done his work, and being now entitled to the promised reward, and his title to his reward is no longer suspended on anything remaining. So Christ having done our work for us, we are justified as soon as ever we believe in him, as being, through what he has accomplished and finished, now already actually entitled to the reward of life. And justification carries in it not only remission of sins, but also being adjudged to life, or accepted as entitled by righteousness to the reward of life: as is evident, because believers are justified by communion with Christ in his justification. But the justification of Christ did most certainly imply both these things, viz. his being now judged free of that guilt which he had taken upon him, and also his having now fulfilled all righteousness — his having perfectly obeyed the Father, and done enough to entitle him to the reward of life as our head and surety — and therefore he then had eternal life given him as our head. That life which was begun when he was raised from the dead, was eternal life. Christ was then justified in the same sense that Adam would have been justified, if he had finished his course of perfect obedience, and therefore implies in it confirmation in a title to life, as that would have done. And thus, all those that are risen with Christ, and have him for their surety, and so are justified in his justification, are certainly in like manner confirmed. And again, that a believer’s justification implies not only a deliverance from the wrath of God, but a title to glory, is evident by Rom. 6:12, where the apostle mentions both these as joint benefits implied in justification: “Therefore, being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ. By whom also we have access into this grace wherein we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God.” So remission of sins and inheritance among them that are sanctified are mentioned together, as what are jointly obtained by faith in Christ: Acts 26:18, “That they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them that are sanctified, through faith that is in me.” Both these are undoubtedly implied in that passing from death unto life, which Christ speaks of as the fruit of faith, and which he opposes to condemnation: John 5:24, “Verily I say unto you, he that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation, but is passed from death unto life.”

726. Persevering Holiness. It is one act of faith to commit the soul to Christ’s keeping in this sense, viz. to keep it from falling. The believing soul is convinced of its own weakness and helplessness, its inability to resist its enemies, its insufficiency to keep itself, and so commits itself to Christ, that he would be its keeper. The apostle speaks of his committing his soul by faith to Christ, under great sufferings and trials of his perseverance, 2 Tim. 1:12, “For which cause also I suffer these things. Nevertheless, I am not ashamed: for I know whom I have believed, and am persuaded that he is able to keep that which I have committed to him against that day.” And we are commanded to commit our way and our works unto the Lord, Psa. 37:5; Prov. 16:3. Faith depends on Christ for all the good we need, and especially good of this kind, which is of such absolute necessity in order to the salvation of our souls. The sum of the good that faith looks for, is the Holy Spirit. It looks for spiritual and eternal life: for perfect holiness in heaven and persevering holiness here. For the just shall live by faith.

729. Congruity of Justification and Perseverance. Perseverance is acknowledged by Calvinian divines, to be necessary to salvation. Yet it seems to me that the manner in which it is necessary has not been sufficiently set forth. It is owned to be necessary as a sine qua non; and also that though it is not that by which we first come to have a title to eternal life, yet it is necessary in order to the actual possession of it, as the way to it; that it is as impossible we should come to it without perseverance, as it is impossible for a man to go to a city or town, without traveling throughout the road that leads to it. But we are really saved by perseverance, so that salvation has a dependence on perseverance, as that which influences in the affair, so as to render it congruous that we should be saved. Faith (on our part) is the great condition of salvation, and it is that by which we are justified and saved. But in this faith, the perseverance that belongs to it is a fundamental ground of the congruity that faith gives to salvation. Faith is that which renders it congruous that we should be accepted to a title of salvation, and it is so on the account of certain properties in, or certain things that belong to it. And this is one of them: viz. its perseverance. Without this, it would not be fit that a sinner should be accepted to salvation. Perseverance indeed comes into consideration, even in the justification of a sinner, as one thing on which the fitness of acceptance to life depends. For God has respect to perseverance as being virtually in the first act of faith. And it is looked upon as if it were a property of that faith by which the sinner is then justified. God has respect to continuance in faith, and the sinner is justified by that, as though it already were, because by divine establishment it shall follow. And so it is accepted, as if it were a property contained in the faith that is then seen. Without this, it would not be congruous that a sinner should be justified at his first believing, but it would be needful that the act of justification should be suspended till the sinner had persevered in faith. There is the same reason why it is necessary that the union between Christ and the soul should remain in order to salvation, as that it should be begun, for it is begun to the end that it might remain. And if it could be begun without remaining, the beginning would be in vain. The soul is saved no otherwise than by union with Christ, and so is fitly looked upon as his. It is saved in him, and in order to that, it is necessary that the soul now be in him, even when salvation is actually bestowed, and not merely that it should once have been in him. In order to its being saved, it must now be one of Christ’s, and in order to being fitly or congruously looked on as now one of Christ’s, it is necessary it should now be united, and not solely that it should be remembered that it was once united to Christ. And there is the same reason why believing, or the quality wherein the unition consists, should remain, in order to the union’s remaining, or why the unition should once be, in order to the union’s once being. The first act of faith gives a title to salvation, because it does virtually trust in God and Christ for perseverance, among other benefits, and gives a title to this benefit with others, and so virtually contains perseverance. Otherwise it would not be congruous that the sinner should be justified in the first act of faith. And therefore God, in justifying a sinner, even in the first act of faith, has respect to the congruity between justification and perseverance of faith. So that perseverance is necessary to salvation, not only as a sine qua non, or as the way to possession, but it is necessary even to the congruity of justification….

That perseverance is thus necessary to salvation, not only as a sine qua non, but by reason of such an influence and dependence, seems manifest from Scripture, as particularly, Heb. 10:38-39, “Now the just shall live by faith. But if any man draw back, my soul shall have no pleasure in him. But we are not of them who draw back unto perdition, but of them that believe unto the saving of the soul.” Rom. 11:20, “Well, because of unbelief they were broken off. But thou standest by faith. Be not high minded, but fear.” John 15:7, “If ye abide in me, and my words abide in you, ye shall ask what ye will, and it shall be done unto you.” Heb. 3:14, “For we are made partakers of Christ, if we hold the beginning of our confidence firm unto the end.” Heb. 5:12, “Be ye followers of them, who through faith and patience inherit the promises.” So that not only the first act of faith, but subsequent acts of faith, and perseverance in faith, do justify the sinner, although salvation is in itself sure and certain after the first act. For the way in which the first act of faith justifies, is not by making the futurition of salvation certain in itself, for that is as certain in itself by the divine decree, before the first act of faith, as afterwards. But it is only in these two ways that any act of ours can connect salvation with the subject. First. As it may give a congruity. Second. As it gives such a divine manifestation of the futurition of salvation to us, that we can lay hold of and depend on the divine truth and faithfulness, that we shall have salvation. Salvation is in some sense the sinner’s right, before he believes. It was given him in Christ, before the world was. But before a sinner believes, he has not anything from God that he can lay hold of, so as to either challenge it, or on good grounds hope for it. He cannot be said to have any right, because he has no congruity, and as to the promise made to Christ, he has no hold to that, because that is not revealed to him. If God had declared and promised to the angels that such a man should be saved, that would not give him any right of his own or any ground of challenge. A promise is a manifestation of a person’s design of doing some good to another, to the end that he may depend on it, and rest in it. The certainty in him arises from the manifestation, and the obligation in justice to him arises from the manifestation being made to him, to the effect that he might depend on it. And therefore subsequent acts of faith may be said to give a sinner a title to salvation, as well as the first. For from what has been said, it appears that the congruity arises from them, as well as the first: they in like manner containing the nature of unition to Christ as mediator, and they may have as great, nay, a greater hand in the manifestation of the futurition of salvation to us for our dependence, than the first act. For our knowledge of this may proceed mainly from after-acts, and from a course of acts. This is all that is peculiar to the first act, that so far as the act is plain, it gives us evidence from God for our dependence: both for continued acts of faith, and also the salvation that is connected with them. So that so far as this act is plain to us, we can challenge both these as our right. The Scripture speaks of after-acts of faith in both Abraham and Noah, as giving a title to the righteousness which is the matter of justification. See Rom. 4:3; Heb. 11:7.

750. God Will Maintain His Good Work. Grace is that which God implants in the heart against great opposition of enemies, great opposition from the corruption of the heart, and from Satan and the world. Great are the efforts of all these against the implantation of it, and they all labor to the utmost to keep it out. Seeing therefore that God manifests his all-conquering power in giving grace a place in the heart in spite of
those enemies, he will doubtless maintain it there against their united efforts to root it out. He that has so gloriously conquered them in bringing in grace, will not at last suffer himself to be conquered, by their expelling that which he has so brought in by his mighty power. He that gloriously subdued those enemies under his feet, by bringing this image of his into the soul, will not suffer this image of his finally to be trampled under their feet. God alone could introduce it. It was what he undertook, and it was wholly his work, and doubtless he will maintain it. He will not forsake the work of his own hands. Where he has begun a good work, he will carry it on to the day of Christ. Grace shall endure all things and shall remain under all things, as the expression ðáíôá õðïìåíåé literally signifies, in 1 Cor. 13:7.

755. A Sure Covenant. The Spirit of God was given at first, but was lost. God gives it a second time, never to be utterly lost. The Spirit gives it a second time, never to be utterly lost. The Spirit is now given in another manner than it was then. Then indeed it was communicated and dwelt in their hearts. But this communication was made without conveying at the same time any proper right or sure title to it. But when God communicates it the second time, as he does to a true convert, he withal gives it to him to be his own. He finally makes it over to him in a sure covenant. He is their purchased and promised possession. If our first parents had had a right to the Holy Spirit made over to them at first, he never would have departed from them.

Man, in his first estate, had no benefit at all properly made over to him, for God makes over benefits only by covenant, and then the condition of the covenant had not been fulfilled. But now, man, at his first conversion, is justified and adopted: he is received as a child and an heir, as a joint heir with Christ. His fellowship is with the Father and with his Son Jesus Christ. God is theirs, Christ is theirs, and the Holy Ghost is theirs, and all things are theirs. The Holy Spirit, who is the sum of all good, is their inheritance, and that little of it that they have in this life is the earnest of their future inheritance, till the redemption of the purchased possession.

Heaven is theirs: their conversation is there. They are citizens of that city, and of the household of God. Christians are represented as being come already to heaven, to Mount Zion, the city of the living God, to an innumerable company of angels, etc. — Heaven is the proper country of the church. They are raised up together with Christ, and made to sit together in heavenly places: Eph. 2:6, “They are blessed with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places.” The whole tenor of the gospel shows that Christians have actually a full and final right made over to them, to spiritual and heavenly blessings.

773. Christ’s Mediation and Perseverance. The doctrine of perseverance is manifest from the nature of the mediation of Christ. For as Christ is a mediator to reconcile God to man, and man to God, and as he is a middle person between both and has the nature of both, so he undertakes for each, and in some respect, becomes surety for each with the other. He undertakes and becomes a surety for man to God. He engages for him, that the law that was given him shall be answered, and that justice, with respect to him, shall be satisfied, and the honor of God’s majesty vindicated. So he undertakes and engages for the Father with man, in order to his being reconciled to God, and induced to come to him, to love him, and trust confidently in him, and rest quietly in him. He undertakes for the Father’s acceptance and favor, John 14:21, “He that loveth me shall be loved of my Father.” He undertakes that the Father shall hear and answer their prayers. He becomes surety to see that their prayers are answered; John 14:13, “Whatsoever ye shall ask of the Father in my name, that will I do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son.” He undertakes that they shall have all necessary supplies of grace from the Father, and he engages for the continuance of God’s presence with them, and the continuance of his favor, and of the supplies of grace from the Father. And he engages for the continuance of God’s presence with them, and the continuance of his favor, and of the supplies of grace necessary to uphold and preserve them, and keep them from finally perishing, John 14:16, “And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever.” And verse 23, “If a man love me, he will keep my words, and my Father will love him, and we will come to him, and make our abode with him.” Christ does not only declare that God will give us needed grace, but he himself undertakes to see it done. He promises that he will bestow it from the Father; John 15:26, “But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send you from the Father.” It was necessary that some one should thus undertake for God with man, for the continuance of his pardoning and sanctifying grace, in order to the sinner’s being fully reconciled to God, and brought fully and quietly to rest in him as his God. Otherwise the sinner, conscious of his own weakness and sinfulness, could have no quiet rest in God, for fear of the union being broken between God and him, and for fear of incurring God’s displeasure and wrath, and so having God an enemy forever. He is in a capacity to undertake for us, and be surety for us, with the Father, because he puts himself in our stead. He also is in a capacity to undertake for the Father, and be surety for him with us, because the Father has put him in his stead. He puts himself in our stead as priest and answers for us, and does and suffers in that office what we should have done and suffered, and God puts him in his stead as King. He is appointed to the government of the world, as God’s vicegerent, and so in that office, answers for God to us, and does, and orders, and bestows that which we need from God. He undertakes for us in things that are expected of us as subjects, because he puts himself into our subjection. He appears in the form of a servant for us. So he undertakes for the Father, in that which is desired and hoped for of him as king. For the Father has put him into his kingdom and dominion, and has committed all authority and power unto him. He is in a capacity to undertake for the Father with us, because he can say, as in John 16:15, “All things that the Father hath are mine.”

774. Perseverance Based upon Christ. The first covenant failed of bringing man to the glory of God, through man’s instability, whereby he failed of perseverance. Man’s changeableness was the thing wherein it was weak. It was weak through the flesh. *44* But God had made a second covenant in mercy to fallen man, that in the way of this covenant he might be brought to the glory of God, which he failed of under the other. But it is God’s manner, in things that he appoints and constitutes, when one thing fails of its proper end, he appoints another to succeed in the room of it: to introduce that the second time, in which the weaknesses and defects of the former are supplied, and which never shall fail, but shall surely reach its end, and so shall remain as that which needs no other to succeed it. So God removed the first dispensation by Moses, Heb. 8:7-13, “For if the first covenant had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second….” So the priesthood of the order of Aaron ceases, because of the weakness and insufficiency of it to answer the ends of priesthood, which are, to reconcile God to man. Therefore God introduces another priesthood, of the order of Melchizedek, that is sufficient, and cannot fail, and remains forever. Heb. 7:11-12 and verses 15-19. “After the similitude of Melchizedek, there ariseth another priest, who is made, not after the law of a carnal commandment, but after the power of an endless life. For he testifieth, Thou art a priest forever, after the order of Melchizedek. For there is verily a disannulling of the commandment going before, for the weakness and unprofitableness thereof. For the law made nothing perfect; but the bringing in of a better hope did.” — What the law failed of, being weak through the flesh, Christ performed, Rom. 8:3-4, “For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin condemned sin in the flesh; that the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us….” So the old heavens and earth are destroyed, because of their defects, and a new heaven and earth are introduced, that are to remain forever. Heb. 12:26-28, “But now hath he promised, yet once more I shake not the earth only, but also heaven. And this word, yet once more, signifieth the removing of those things that are shaken, as of those things that are made, that those things which cannot be shaken may remain….” So Moses, the first leader of Israel, failed of bringing them into Canaan, but Joshua, the second leader, did not fail. The kingdom of Saul, the first anointed of the Lord, did not continue, but the kingdom of the second anointed remains forever. The first sanctuary that was built in Israel was a movable tabernacle, and therefore ready to vanish away or be removed finally: — and God forsook the tabernacle of Shiloh. But the second sanctuary was a firm building, an immovable temple, which was typically an everlasting sanctuary, and that which God would never forsake, 2 Sam. 7:10-11. So the first covenant, that God made with Adam, failed, because it was weak through the weakness of human nature, to whose strength and stability the keeping was entrusted. Therefore God introduces another better covenant, committed not to his strength, but to the strength of one that was mighty and stable, and therefore is a sure and everlasting covenant. God entrusted the affair of man’s happiness on a weak foundation at first, to show man that the foundation was weak, and not to be trusted to, that he might trust in God alone. The first was only to make way for the second. God lighted up a divine light in man’s soul at the first, but it remained on such a foundation that Satan found means to extinguish it, and therefore, when God lights it up a second time, it is that it may never be extinguished.

795. Christ’s Perfect Perseverance. Some things may yet remain that are properly the conditions of salvation, on which salvation may be suspended, that it may well excite to the utmost caution, lest we should come short of eternal life and should perish for the want of them, after it is already become impossible that we should fail of salvation. For the condition on which the man Christ Jesus was to obtain eternal life, was his doing the work which God had given him to do, his performing perfect persevering obedience, and his therein conquering Satan, the world and all opposition, and enduring all sufferings that he met with. Therefore Christ used the utmost diligence to do this work and used the utmost caution lest he should fail of it. He prayed with strong crying and tears, and wrestled with God in a bloody sweat, that he might not fail, but might have God’s help to go through. Yet it was impossible he should fail of eternal life, and the whole reward that had been promised him. The joy that was set before him was not only certain to him, but he had a proper title to it as God’s heir, by reason of his relation to God the Father, as being his only-begotten Son. It was impossible that he should fail in the work to which he was appointed, as God had promised him sufficient and effectual grace and help to persevere, and already had made known his election: Psa. 110:7, “He shall drink of the brook in the way, therefore shall he lift up the head.” Isa. 42:1, “Behold my servant whom I uphold; mine elect, in whom my soul delighteth. I have put my Spirit upon him. He shall bring forth judgment to the Gentiles.” Verse 4, “He shall not fail nor be discouraged.” And Isa. 42:6, “I the Lord have called thee in righteousness: I will hold thine hand and keep thee.” See also Isa. 41:8, 10. So it was in effect promised in the revelations that were made to Mary and Joseph, Zechariah, etc. and so to himself in answer to his prayers, by a voice from heaven: “I have both glorified it, and will glorify it again.” And so probably by Moses and Elias in the Mount, and by the voice from heaven there, and by the angel strengthening him in answer to his prayer in his agony. It appears that all was certain beforehand, by God’s actually saving great numbers beforehand on the ground of his future perseverance in his work.

799. Concerning Falling from Grace.

1. Concerning the objection from Eze. 18:24, “If the righteous shall fall from his righteousness and commit iniquity, all his righteousness shall not be remembered; but in the iniquity which he hath done shall he die,” and the like: God saying this does not at all prove that it is supposed possible that a truly righteous man should fall from his righteousness, any more than God’s saying, Lev. 18:4-5, “ye shall do my judgments and keep mine ordinances, to walk therein: I am the Lord your God: ye shall therefore keep my statues and my judgments, which if a man do, he shall even live in them.” And the same, Lev. 18:13, 21. And to the same purpose, verse 22…. I say, what is said in the forementioned places no more proves it to be possible for a truly righteous man to fall from righteousness, so as to die in iniquity, than these places prove that it is possible for a man to do these things required in God’s statutes and judgments, so as to live in them by the express sentence of the apostle, when speaking of those very passages of the Old Testament: Rom. 10:5, “For Moses described the righteousness which is of the law, that the man which doeth them, shall live in them.” The truth concerning both these assertions of the Old Testament, seems to be that they are proposed to us as signifying and containing divers verities, and for a diverse use in application to ourselves.

First. For wise ends they are proposed to us as supposing something that is (though not in itself yet) in the present state of things impossible, to declare the certain connection of the impossible things, supposed with something else. So that all that is taught is the certain connection between the antecedent and consequent. But it is not taught that the antecedent shall ever be, or that it ever can be. So the Scripture in saying that he that doeth these things shall live in them, does not design to teach us that in the present state of things, it is possible for us to do those things in a legal sense (in which sense the words are certainly proposed, as the apostle teaches), but only teaches the certain connection there is between doing these things and living in them, for wise ends: particularly to lead us, by such a legal proposal, to see our utter inability to obtain life by our own doings. So the law is our schoolmaster to bring us to Christ. Especially was it proper that these things should both be proposed: The one to be earnestly sought, though impossible to obtain, and the other to be carefully avoided, though impossible to be fallen into, under the Old Testament, when the impossibility of either the one or the other was not so clearly and fully revealed, as now under the gospel. So also the Scripture, in saying that if the righteous shall fall away from his righteousness, he shall die, does not teach us that in the present state of things, since the fall, it is possible for a truly righteous man to fall from his righteousness, but only teaches us the certain connection between the antecedent and the consequent, for wise ends, and particularly that those who think themselves righteous, may beware of falling from righteousness. For it is not unreasonable to suppose that God should put us on bewaring of those things that are already impossible, any more than that he should direct us to seek and pray for those things that are promised and certain.

Second. In another way both these things are proposed more evangelically, as having respect to that doing of those things and that falling from righteousness, that are possible, viz. doing those things in an evangelical and believing obedience, which in strictest is not a proper doing of them, and a falling from a visible and external, material righteousness or godliness, which is not in strictness a proper godliness. Concerning the former of these, viz. doing these things, it is certain both senses are to be taken into view: the legal one, as is evident by the apostle, and the evangelical possible one must also be understood, as is plain from the context of those places in the Old Testament. And that we should so understand the latter, is equally free of difficulty and objection….

2. If the doctrine of falling from grace be embraced, it would have a great tendency to prevent an act of faith. For if so, a person, if he should venture his soul on Christ, could not be assured that Christ would save him.

3. That there is a real difference between them that fall away and them that persevere, even before they fall away, is evident by the things that are given as a reason of their falling away: because they have not rooted themselves, because they have not counted the cost, and because they have no oil in their vessels. Those that have no root differ from those that have root, before there be the effect of their having no root: and so those that have no oil, etc. And it appears again, by what is said, John 2:23, that “when Christ was at Jerusalem at the passover, on the feast day, many believed in his name, when they saw the miracles which he did. But Jesus did not commit himself unto them, because he knew all men, and needed not that any should testify of man: for he knew what was in man.” And so by that, “They went out from us, because they were not of us. If they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us.”….

4. That they that once truly believed in Christ never fall away finally and perish is evident, because they that now believe not, and are in a state of condemnation, are spoken of as those that never have believed. John 3:18, “Because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.” Which supposes that none of those that have believed are now unbelievers, or are now in a state of condemnation. So again, those that shall be condemned at the day of judgment, are represented as those, not only that Christ then will know not, but as those that he never knew, Mat. 7:23. But how can this be a true representation, of some of them were once true Christians, and so were known and owned by Christ, but only have since apostatized?

5. 1 John 3:6, “Whosoever sinneth, hath not seen him, neither known him.” This could not be true, if it might be so that a man that has truly seen him and known him, might finally fall away to sin.

6. Objections. First. Objection from Scripture cautions against falling away, lest it should issue in damnation. God had been pleased to connect eternal life with eating the fruit of the tree of life, and therefore, although it was utterly impossible that Adam should have eternal life in himself, after he had fallen, as God’s preemptory declaration and unalterable constitution had made it impossible. Yet we are told that after the fall, God place cherubims and a flaming sword to keep the way of the tree of life, lest the man should put forth his hand and take and eat of the fruit of the tree, and live forever. So God has connected damnation and living in allowed sin, and being overcome by sin and brought under its power. And therefore, although it be impossible that men, after they are once truly converted, should ever perish, yet they are warned against falling away and yielding to the power of sin, lest they should perish: and the apostle Paul kept under his body, lest he should be a castaway.

Second. As to objections from such hypothetical propositions as those in Heb. 10:26, etc. “If we sin wilfully, after we have received the knowledge of the truth.” Heb. 6:4, etc. “For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, if they fall away,” etc. Such hypothetical propositions may be true, when one or both parts of it are impossible, as the truth of such a proposition consists in the connection of the antecedent and consequent: as when our Lord said to the Jews, “If I should say, I know him not, I should be a liar like unto you.” See Gill against Whitby, vol. 1, page 27.

Third. Objection. That we are required to “take care” and “pray” that we may persevere. It was impossible for Christ to fail under his trials, and yet how evident is it that he used means, endeavors, care, labor, and earnest prayers, that he might persevere?

7. Inquiry. Whether an absolute promise of perseverance does consist with counsels and exhortation to endeavor, and care to persevere.

In answer to this, I would lay down the following positions.

Position 1. Things that it is proper for us to seek by earnest and importunate prayer, it is proper for us to use means and labor and care for. The reason is plain: prayer is one kind of seeking the things. It is using means, and one way of laboring for it, taking care to obtain it, and pursuing after it.

There are many instances of prayer and commands to pray for things promised. Christ on earth prayed for things promised, and he continually intercedes in heaven for things promised.

Position 2. That which it is proper persons should use endeavors, means, and care for, they are properly exhorted to use means and endeavors for.

Position 3. That which it is proper for another to use means, labors and care for, that he may obtain it, though he knows it is certainly promised, it is proper that we should use means, etc. to obtain for ourselves, though it is promised.

But Christ used means, endeavors, labor, etc. for the salvation of sincerely good men, though it be promised.

8. The Christian precept, which forbids anxiety in Christians, is a demonstration of the doctrine of perseverance: “Be careful for nothing, but in everything, by prayer and supplication with thanksgiving, let your requests be made known to God.”

9. Christ labored, sought, took care, denied himself, and suffered for the salvation of sincerely good men, which yet had been before abundantly promised to him, and promised to men in the Old Testament: and Christ himself had promised it. The Scripture represents that Christ ran a race to win a prize, and endured the cross for the joy that was set before him.

10. That a truly good man will not backslide is evident from Pro. 14:14, “The backslider in heart shall be filled with his own way; and a good man shall be satisfied from himself.” Here is a plain opposition, both in the subject and predicate of this proposition, which plainly shows it to be incompatible to a good man that he should be a back slider….

11. If it were left to the freedom of men’s own will, whether men should persevere, in the sense that the Arminians suppose, i.e. to a will not determined by God, but self-determined, then it would be absurd to pray to God that we may persevere, that he would keep us from falling, and that he would uphold our goings in this paths, etc.

808. Necessity of Perseverance. The perseverance of faith is necessary to a congruity to salvation. For it is implied in several places of Scripture, that if true believers should fail in persevering in faith, they would be in a lost state. John 18:8-9, “Jesus answered, I have told you that I am he. If therefore ye seek me, let these go their way: that the saying might be fulfilled which he spake, ‘Of them which thou gavest me, have I lost none:’” i.e. Christ took care that they might go away, that they might not be in the way of such temptations as would be in danger of overthrowing them, so that they should not persevere. And it is implied that if they were overthrown and should not persevere, Christ would have lost them: the saving relation that they stood in to Christ would have been dissolved. The same seems fully implied in Christ’s prayer in the 17th chapter of John. Thus, he makes use not only of their having received God’s Word and believed that God had sent him, but their having kept his word, as a good plea for their title to that favor and acceptance of the Father, which he asks of the Father for them, as John 17:6-8, etc. — The same is implied in the 11th verse: “Holy Father, keep through thine own name those whom thou hast given me, that they may be one, as we are.” This implies that their being one or their standing in a saving relation to him and in union with his mystical body, depends on the perseverance of their faith, even that union on which a title to all spiritual and saving benefits depends, which is more fully spoken of in the 21st and following verses. This perseverance of believers seems to be the benefit, which is the principal subject of this whole prayer. And in Luke 22:31-32, it is implied, that if Peter’s faith had failed, Satan would have had him: “And the Lord said, Simon, Simon, Satan hath desired to have you, that he may sift you as wheat; but I have prayed for thee that thy faith fail not.” 1 Pet. 1:5, “Who are kept by the power of God, through faith unto salvation.” Where it seems implied that if they were not kept through faith, or if their faith did not persevere, they never would come to salvation. So believers being overthrown in their faith, or their not knowing Christ’s voice and following him, is called a being plucked out of Christ’s hand, and it is implied that the consequence would be their perishing. It also seems to be implied that their possession of eternal life by Christ’s gift depends on their perseverance. John 10:27-28, “My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me; and I will give unto them eternal life, and they shall never perish, neither shall any pluck them out of my hand.” And in the 15th chapter of John, believers persevering in faith in Christ, or their abiding in him, is spoken of as necessary to the continuance of the saving union and relation that is between Christ and believers, and Christ’s abiding in them, as John 15:4-5, “Abide in me, and I in you. — I am the vine, ye are the branches. He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit.” And in the 6th verse, it is spoken of as the necessary consequence of their not abiding in Christ (if that were possible), that the union should be utterly broken between Christ and them, and that damnation should be the consequence. “If a man abide not in me, he is cast forth as a branch, and is withered, and men gather them and cast them into the fire and they are burned.” And in the 7th verse, this perseverance of faith is spoken of as the necessary means of the success of faith as expressed in prayer, which is faith’s voice, necessary to obtain those good things which faith and prayer seek, “If ye abide in me, and my words abide in you, ye shall ask what ye will, and it shall be done unto you.” And in the 9th and 10th verses, it is implied that Christ’s acceptance of us and favor to us as his, depends on our perseverance: “As the Father hath loved me, so have I loved you. Continue ye in my love. If ye keep my commandments, ye shall abide in my love, even as I have kept my Father’s commandments, and abide in his love.” So the same perseverance is spoken of as necessary to our continuing in the favor and grace of God. “Now, when the congregation was broken up, many of the Jews and religious proselytes followed Paul and Barnabas, who speaking to them, persuaded them to continue in the grace of God.” And so it is spoken of as necessary to continuing in the goodness of God; and being cut off, is spoken of as a certain consequence of the contrary. Rom. 11:22, “Behold therefore the goodness and severity of God: on them which fell, severity; but towards thee, goodness, if thou continue in his goodness: otherwise, thou also shalt be cut off.” That expression, of standing fast in the Lord, 1 Thes. 3:8, and Phil. 4:1, implies that perseverance is necessary to a continuing in Christ, or in a saving relation to him, and more plainly still in 1 John 2:24, “Let that therefore abide in you which you have heard from the beginning. If that which ye have heard from the beginning shall remain in you, ye also shall continue in the Son and in the Father.” See 1 Cor. 15:2, and 2 Tim. 4:7, 8, and Heb. 12:28. See also Jer. 3:19.

823. Saints Shall Persevere. It shows the infallible perseverance of true Christians, that their spiritual life is a participation with Christ in the life that he received as risen from the dead. For they live by Christ’s living in them, Gal. 2:20, “I am crucified with Christ; nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me; and the life which I now live in the flesh, I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me:” that is, by the life that he has received since his resurrection, and by his communicating to them that fullness which he received when he rose from the dead. When he rose, he received the promise of the Father, the Spirit of life without measure, and he sheds it forth on believers. The oil poured on the risen head goes down to the skirts of the garments, and thus Christ lives in believers by his Spirit dwelling in them. Believers, in their conversion, are said to be risen with Christ; Col. 2:12-13, “Ye are risen with him through the faith of the operation of God, who hath raised him from the dead. And you, being dead in your sins, and the circumcision of your flesh, hath he quickened together with him.” And chap. 3:1, “If ye then be risen with Christ,” etc. And Eph. 2:5-6, “Even when we were dead in sins, hath quickened us together with Christ, and hath raised us up together.” Rom. 5:10, “For it, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life.” — and so on throughout the chapter. This spiritual resurrection and life is procured and purchased for Christ’s members, by Christ’s suffering obedience, in the same manner as his own resurrection and life is purchased by it. And they receive life as united to him, as members of a risen Savior, and as being married in their conversion to him, as in the beginning of Romans chapter 7, which is a continuation of that forecited discourse in the 6th chapter. That justification which believers have at their conversion is as partaking of the justification that Christ had in his resurrection, and so all the benefits that believers have (their comfort, hope and joy here, and their life hereafter) are as partaking with a risen Savior. We are begotten again to a lively hope by the resurrection of Christ from the dead, to and inheritance incorruptible. See Eph. 1:18-21.

Hence it follows that the saints shall surely persevere in their spiritual life and their justified state. The apostle hence argues, in Romans chapter 6, that believers are finally freed from sin and shall live forever with Christ, and that sin shall no more have dominion over them. Verse 9, “Knowing that Christ being raised from the dead, dieth no more; death hath no more dominion over him.” Compared with Rom. 6:5-7, 10, 14. Christ’s resurrection life is an immortal, unfailing life. Rev. 1:18, “I am he that liveth, and was dead; and behold I am alive for ever more.” Hence the benefits that believers receive, in being connected and risen with Christ, are sure and unfailing mercies. Acts 13:34, “And as concerning that he raised him up from the dead, now no more to return to corruption, he said on this wise, I will give you the sure mercies of David.” This is the living bread, and hence he that eats thereof shall not die, but shall live forever, John 6:50-51. The saints cannot die for their life is hid with Christ in God, who is risen and ascended, and is with God in Glory, in immortal life, Col. 3:3, 4.

857. Seek God’s Righteousness. Christ, in Mat. 5:33, commands those who have already some faith, to seek the righteousness of God, which the apostle distinguishes from our own righteousness. Yea, the words imply that he directs us to seek the righteousness of God, by which we may obtain the kingdom of God. “Seek ye first the kingdom of God and his righteousness.” Compare this with verse 30, where those that he then especially directs himself to in this counsel are spoken of as having already some faith. See also Mat. 5:1 and Mat. 13:14-16.

945. Perseverance As a Duty of the Saints. That the saints should be earnestly exhorted and pressed to care and caution, and to earnest endeavors to persevere, is most reasonable, and it cannot be otherwise, notwithstanding their having an absolute, unchangeable promise that they shall persevere. For still perseverance is their duty and what they are to do in obedience to God. For that is the notion of perseverance: their holding out in the way of God’s commandments. But if it were absurd to command them to persevere, as the work they have to do, then how would they do it in obedience to him? The angels in heaven are confirmed, and it is promised unto them that they never shall sin, yet it is proper for God to give them commands, though in so doing he requires the improvement of their care and endeavors to obey and fulfill his will exactly. It is not obedience, if they do not take care and endeavor to obey. If they should cease to take care, that very thing would prove their fall. So, in this case, if Christians cease to take care to persevere, that very thing is falling away.

1188. Continuance in Faith. It seems to be because continuance in faith is necessary to continuance in justification, at least in part, that the apostle expresses himself as he does, Rom. 1:17, “For therein the righteousness of God is revealed from faith unto faith; as it is written, The just shall live by faith.” For it is by faith that we first perceive and know this righteousness, and do at first receive and embrace it. And being once interested in it, we have the continuance of faith in future persevering exercises of it made sure to us. And thus that is fulfilled, “The just shall live by faith.” Agreeable to 1 Pet. 1:5, “We are kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation.” And also Heb. 10:35-39, “Cast not away therefore your confidence, which hath great recompence of reward. For ye have need of patience, that after ye have done the will of God, ye might receive the promise. For yet a little while, and he that shall come, will come, and will not tarry. Now, the just shall live by faith, but if any man draw back, my soul shall have no pleasure in him. But we are not of them who draw back unto perdition, but of them that believe to the saving of the soul.” And Heb. 3:6, 14, 18, 19; and Heb. 4:1, 11; Heb. 6:4, 11, 12, and in the former part of John chapter 15, “Abide in me, and I in you. If a man abide not in me, he is cast forth as a branch. Continue ye in my love. If ye keep my commandments, ye shall abide in my love, even as I have kept my Father’s commandments, and abide in his love.” It was impossible that Christ should not continue in his Father’s love. He was entitled to such help and support from him, as should be effectual to uphold him in obedience to his Father. And yet it was true that if Christ had not kept his Father’s commandments, he could not have continued in his love. He would have been cast out of favor. See Rom. 11:22; Col. 1:21-23; 1 Tim. 2:15; 2 Tim. 4:7-8; Rom. 4:3, compared with Gen. 15:6; 1 John 2:24-28.

For then for the time ye ought to be teachers, ye have need that one teach you again which be the first principles of the oracles of God; and are become such as have need of milk, and not of strong meatHebrews 5:12

Consider yourselves as scholars or disciples put into the school of Christ and therefore be diligent to make proficiency in Christian knowledge.  Content not yourselves with this, that you have been taught your catechism in your childhood, and that you know as much of the principles of religion as is necessary to salvation or else you will be guilty of what the apostle warns against, viz. going no further than laying the foundation of repentance from dead works, etc.

You are all called to be Christians, and this is your profession.  Endeavor, therefore, to acquire knowledge in things which pertain to your profession.  Let not your teachers have cause to complain that while they spend and are spent to impart knowledge to you, you take little pains to learn.  It is a great encouragement to an instructor to have such to teach as make a business of learning, bending their minds to it.  This makes teaching a pleasure, when otherwise it will be a very heavy and burdensome task.

You all have by you a large treasure of divine knowledge in that you have the Bible in your hands; therefore be not contented in possessing but little of this treasure.  God hath spoken much to you in the Scriptures; labor to understand as much of what he saith as you can.  God hath made you all reasonable creatures; therefore let not the noble faculty of reason or understanding lie neglected.  Content not yourselves with having so much knowledge as is thrown in your way, and receive in some sense unavoidably by the frequent inculcation of divine truth in the preaching of the word, of which you are obliged to be hearers, or accidentally gain in conversation; but let it be very much your business to search for it, and that with the same diligence and labor with which men are wont to dig in mines of silver and gold.

Especially I would advise those who are young to employ themselves in this way.  Men are never too old to learn; but the time of youth is especially the time for learning; it is peculiarly proper for gaining and storing up knowledge.  Further, to stir up all, both old and young, to this duty, let me entreat you to consider,

1. If you apply yourselves diligently to this work, you will not lack [usefulness], when you are at leisure from your common secular business. In this way, you may find something in which you may profitably employ yourselves.  You will find something else to do, besides going about from house to house, spending one hour after another in unprofitable conversation, or, at best, to no other purpose but to amuse yourselves, to fill up and wear away your time.  And it is to be feared that very much of the time spent in evening visits is spent to a much worse purpose than that which I have now mentioned.  Solomon tells us, Prov. 10:19, “That in the multitude of words, there lacketh not sin.”  And is not this verified in those who find little else to do but to go to one another’s houses and spend the time in such talk as comes next, or such as anyone’s present disposition happens to suggest?

Some diversion is doubtless lawful; but for Christians to spend so much of their time, so many long evenings, in no other conversation than that which tends to divert and amuse, if nothing worse, is a sinful way of spending time, and tends to poverty of soul at least, if not to outward poverty: Prov. 14:23, “In all labor there is profit; but the talk of the lips tendeth only to penury.”  Besides, when persons for so much of their time have nothing else to do, but to sit, and talk, and chat, there is great danger of falling into foolish and sinful conversation, venting their corrupt dispositions, in talking against others, expressing their jealousies and evil surmises concerning their neighbors; not considering what Christ hath said, Matt. 12:36, “Of every idle word that men shall speak, shall they give account in the day of judgment.”

If you would comply with what you have heard from this doctrine, you would find something else to employ your time besides contention, or talking about those public affairs which tend to contention.  Young people might find something else to do besides spending their time in vain company; something that would be much more profitable to themselves, as it would really turn to some good account; something, in doing which they would both be more out of the way of temptation and be more in the way of duty and of a divine blessing.  And even aged people would have something to employ themselves in after they are become incapable of bodily labor.  Their time, as is now often the case, would not lie heavy upon their hands, as they would with both profit and pleasure be engaged in searching the Scriptures and in comparing and meditating upon the various truths which they should find there.

2. This would be a noble way of spending your time. The Holy Spirit gives the Bereans this epithet, because they diligently employed themselves in this business: Acts 17:11, “These were more noble than those of Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.”  Similar to this is very much the employment of heaven.  The inhabitants of that world spend much of their time in searching into the great things of divinity and endeavoring to acquire knowledge in them, as we are told of the angels, 1 Pet. 1:12, “ Which things the angels desire to look into.”  This will be very agreeable to what you hope will be your business to all eternity, as you doubtless hope to join in the same employment with the angels of light.  Solomon says, Prov. 25:2, “It is the honor of kings to search out a matter;” and certainly, above all others, to search out divine matters.  Now, if this be the honor even of kings, is it not much more your honor?

3. This is a pleasant way of improving time. Knowledge is pleasant and delightful to intelligent creatures, and above all, the knowledge of divine things; for in them are the most excellent truths and the most beautiful and amiable objects held forth to view.  However tedious the labor necessarily attending this business may be, yet the knowledge once obtained will richly requite the pains taken to obtain it.  “When wisdom entereth the heart, knowledge is pleasant to the soul,” Prov. 2:10.

4. This knowledge is exceedingly useful in Christian practice.  Such as have much knowledge in divinity have great means and advantages for spiritual and saving knowledge; for no means of grace have a saving effect, otherwise than by the knowledge they impart.  The more you have of a rational knowledge of divine things, the more opportunity will there be, when the Spirit shall be breathed into your heart, to see the excellency of these things, and to taste the sweetness of them.  The heathens, who have no rational knowledge of the things of the gospel, have no opportunity to see the excellency of them; and therefore the more rational knowledge of these things you have, the more opportunity and advantage you have to see the divine excellency and glory of them.

Again, the more knowledge you have of divine things, the better will you know your duty; your knowledge will be of great use to direct you as to your duty in particular cases.  You will also be the better furnished against the temptations of the devil.  For the devil often takes advantage of persons’ ignorance to ply them with temptations which otherwise would have no hold of them.  By having much knowledge, you will be under greater advantages to conduct yourselves with prudence and discretion in your Christian course and so to live much more to the honor of God and religion.  Many who mean well, and are full of a good spirit, yet for want of prudence, conduct themselves so as to wound religion.  Many have a zeal of God which doth more hurt than good because it is not according to knowledge, Rom. 10:2.  The reason why many good men behave no better in many instances is not so much that they lack grace as that they lack knowledge.  Besides, an increase of knowledge would be a great help to profitable conversation.  It would supply you with matter for conversation when you come together or when you visit your neighbors: and so you would have less temptation to spend the time in such conversation as tends to your own and others’ hurt.

5. Consider the advantages you are under to grow in the knowledge of divinity. We are under far greater advantages to gain much of this knowledge now than God’s people under the Old Testament, both because the canon of Scripture is so much enlarged since that time and also because evangelical truths are now so much more plainly revealed.  So that common men are now in some respects under advantages to know more than the greatest prophets were then.  Thus that saying of Christ is in a sense applicable to us, Luke 10:23-24, “Blessed are the eyes which see the things which ye see.  For I tell you, that many prophets and kings have desired to see those things which ye see, and have not seen them; and to hear those things which ye hear, and have not heard them.”  We are in some respects under far greater advantages for gaining knowledge now in these latter ages of the church than Christians were formerly; especially by reason of the art of printing of which God hath given us the benefit, whereby Bibles and other books of divinity are exceedingly multiplied and persons may now be furnished with helps for the obtaining of Christian knowledge at a much easier and cheaper rate than they formerly could.

6. We know not what opposition we may meet with in the religious principles which we hold. We know that there are many adversaries to the gospel and its truths.  If therefore we embrace those truths, we must expect to be attacked by the said adversaries; and unless we be well informed concerning divine things, how shall we be able to defend ourselves?  Beside, the apostle Paul enjoins it upon us, always to be ready to give an answer to every man who asketh us a reason of the hope that is in us.  But this we cannot expect to do without considerable knowledge in divine things.

Directions for the acquisition of Christian knowledge

1. Be assiduous in reading the Holy Scriptures.  This is the fountain whence all knowledge in divinity must be derived.  Therefore let not this treasure lie by you neglected.  Every man of common understanding who can read, may, if he please, become well acquainted with the Scriptures.  And what an excellent attainment would this be!

2. Content not yourselves with only a cursory reading without regarding the sense. This is an ill way of reading, to which, however, many accustom themselves all their days.  When you read, observe what you read.  Observe how things come in.  Take notice of the drift of the discourse and compare one scripture with another.  For the Scripture, by the harmony of its different; parts, casts great light upon itself.  We are expressly directed by Christ, to search the Scriptures, which evidently intends something more than a mere cursory reading.  And use means to find out the meaning of the Scripture.  When you have it explained in the preaching of the word, take notice of it; and if at any time a scripture that you did not understand be cleared up to your satisfaction, mark it, lay it up, and if possible remember it.

3. Procure, and diligently use, other books which may help you to grow in this knowledge.  There are many excellent books which might greatly forward you in this knowledge and afford you a very profitable and pleasant entertainment in your leisure hours.

4. Improve conversation with others to this end.  How much might persons promote each other’s knowledge in divine things if they would improve conversation as they might; if men that are ignorant were not ashamed to show their ignorance and were willing to learn of others; if those that have knowledge would communicate it without pride and ostentation; and if all were more disposed to enter on such conversation as would be for their mutual edification and instruction.

5. Seek not to grow in knowledge chiefly for the sake of applause and to enable you to dispute with others; but seek it for the benefit of your souls, and in order to practice. If applause be your end, you will not be so likely to be led to the knowledge of the truth, but may justly, as often is the case of those who are proud of their knowledge, be led into error to your own perdition.  This being your end, if you should obtain much rational knowledge, it would not be likely to be of any benefit to you, but would puff you up with pride: 1 Cor. 8:1, “Knowledge puffeth up.”

6. Seek God that he would direct you and bless you in this pursuit after knowledge. This is the apostle’s direction, James 1:5, “If any man lack wisdom, let him ask it of God, who giveth to all liberally, and upbraideth not.”  God is the fountain of all divine knowledge: Prov. 2:6, “The Lord giveth wisdom: out of his mouth cometh knowledge and understanding.”  Labor to be sensible of your own blindness and ignorance and your need of the help of God, lest you be led into error, instead of true knowledge: 1 Cor. 3:18, “If any man would be wise, let him become a fool, that he may be wise.”

7. Practice according to what knowledge you have. This will be the way to know more.  The psalmist warmly recommends this way of seeking knowledge in divine truth, from his own experience: Psalm. 119:100, “I understand more than the ancients, because I keep thy precepts.”  Christ also recommends the same: John 7:17, “If any man will do his will, he shall know of the doctrine, whether it be of God, or whether I speak of myself.”

Charity . . . seeketh not her own. 1 Corinthians 13:5

The doctrine of these words plainly is, that the spirit of charity, or christian love, is the opposite of a selfish spirit.

The ruin that the fall brought upon the soul of man consists very much in his losing the nobler and more benevolent principles of his nature, and falling wholly under the power and government of self-love. Before, and as God created him, he was exalted, and noble, and generous; but now he is debased, and ignoble, and selfish. Immediately upon the fall, the mind of man shrank from its primitive greatness and expandedness, to an exceeding smallness and contractedness; and as in other respects, so especially in this. Before, his soul was under the government of that noble principle of divine love, whereby it was enlarged to the comprehension of all his fellow creatures and their welfare. And not only so, but it was not confined within such narrow limits as the bounds of the creation, but went forth in the exercise of holy love to the Creator, and abroad upon the infinite ocean of good, and was, as it were, swallowed up by it, and became one with it.

But so soon as he had transgressed against God, these noble principles were immediately lost, and all this excellent enlargedness of man’s soul was gone; and thenceforward he himself shrank, as it were, into a little space, circumscribed and closely shut up within itself to the exclusion of all things else. Sin, like some powerful astringent, contracted his soul to the very small dimensions of selfishness; and God was forsaken, and fellow creatures forsaken, and man retired within himself, and became totally governed by narrow and selfish principles and feelings. Self-love became absolute master of his soul, and the more noble and spiritual principles of his being took wings and flew away. But God, in mercy to miserable man, entered on the work of redemption, and, by the glorious gospel of his Son, began the work of bringing the soul of man out of its confinement and contractedness, and back again to those noble and divine principles by which it was animated and governed at first. It is through the cross of Christ that he is doing this; for our union with Christ gives us participation in his nature. And so Christianity restores an excellent enlargement, and extensiveness, and liberality to the soul, and again possesses it with that divine love or charity that we read of in the text, whereby it again embraces its fellow creatures, and is devoted to and swallowed up in the Creator. Thus charity so partakes of the glorious fullness of the divine nature, that she “seeketh not her own,” or is contrary to selfish spirit.

In dwelling on this thought, I would, first, show the nature of that selfishness of which charity is the opposite; then how charity is opposed to it; and then some of the evidence in support of the doctrine stated.

I. The nature of the selfishness of which charity is the opposite. — And here I would observe,

1. Negatively, that charity, or the spirit of Christian love, is not contrary to all self-love.

It is not a thing contrary to Christianity that a man should love himself, or, which is the same thing, should love his own happiness. If Christianity did indeed tend to destroy a man’s love to himself, and to his own happiness, it would therein tend to destroy the very spirit of humanity. But the very announcement of the gospel, as a system of peace on earth and goodwill toward men (Luke 2:14), shows that it is not only not destructive of humanity, but in the highest degree promotive of its spirit. That a man should love his own happiness, is as necessary to his nature as the faculty of the will is. It is impossible that such a love should be destroyed in any other way than by destroying his being. The saints love their own happiness. Yea, those that are perfect in happiness, the saints and angels in heaven, love their own happiness; otherwise that happiness which God hath given them would be no happiness to them; for that which anyone does not love he cannot enjoy any happiness in.

That to love ourselves is not unlawful, is evident also from the fact, that the law of God makes self-love a rule and measure by which our love to others should be regulated. Thus Christ commands (Mat. 19:19), “Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself,” which certainly supposes that we may, and must, love ourselves. It is not said more than thyself, but as thyself. But we are commanded to love our neighbor next to God; and therefore we are to love ourselves with a love next to that which we should exercise toward God himself. And the same appears also from the fact, that the Scriptures, from one end of the Bible to the other, are full of motives that are set forth for the very purpose of working on the principle of self-love. Such are all the promises and threatenings of the Word of God, its calls and invitations, its counsels to seek our own good, and its warnings to beware of misery. These things can have no influence on us in any other way than as they tend to work upon our hopes or fears. For to what purpose would it be to make any promise of happiness, or hold forth any threatening of misery, to him that has no love for the former or dread of the latter? Or what reason can there be in counseling him to seek the one, or warning him to avoid the other? Thus it is plain, negatively, that charity, or the spirit of Christian love, is not contrary to all self-love. But I remark still further,

2. Affirmatively, that the selfishness which charity, or a Christian spirit, is contrary to is only an inordinate self-love.

Here, however, the question arises—in what does this inordinateness consist? This is a point that needs to be well stated and clearly settled; for the refutation of many scruples and doubts that persons often have, depends upon it. And therefore I answer,

First, that the inordinateness of self-love does not consist in our love of our own happiness being, absolutely considered, too great in degree.

I do not suppose it can be said of any that their love to their own happiness, if we consider that love absolutely and not comparatively, can be in too high a degree, or that it is a thing that is liable either to increase or diminution. For I apprehend that self-love, in this sense, is not a result of the fall, but is necessary, and what belongs to the nature of all intelligent beings, and that God has made it alike in all; and that saints, and sinners, and all alike, love happiness, and have the same unalterable and instinctive inclination to desire and seek it. The change that takes place in a man, when he is converted and sanctified, is not that his love for happiness is diminished, but only that it is regulated with respect to its exercises and influence, and the courses and objects it leads to. Who will say that the happy souls in heaven do not love happiness as truly as the miserable spirits in hell? If their love of happiness is diminished by their being made holy, then that will diminish their happiness itself; for the less anyone loves happiness, the less he relishes it, and, consequently, is the less happy.

When God brings a soul out of a miserable state and condition into a happy state, by conversion, he gives him happiness that before he had not, but he does not at the same time take away any of his love of happiness. And so, when a saint increases in grace, he is made still more happy than he was before; but his love of happiness, and his relish of it, do not grow less as his happiness itself increases, for that would be to increase his happiness one way, and to diminish it another. But in every case in which God makes a miserable soul happy, or a happy soul still more happy, he continues the same love of happiness that existed before. And so, doubtless, the saints ought to have as much of a principle of love to their own happiness, or love to themselves, which is the same thing, as the wicked have. So that, if we consider men’s love of themselves or of their own happiness absolutely, it is plain that the inordinateness of self-love does not consist in its being in too great a degree, because it is alike in all. But I remark,

Secondly, that the inordinateness of self-love, wherein a corrupt selfishness does consist, lies in two things: — in its being too great comparatively; and in placing our happiness in that which is confined to self. In the first place, the degree of self-love may be too great comparatively, and so the degree of its influence is inordinate. Though the degree of men’s love of their own happiness, taken absolutely, may in all be the same, yet the proportion that their love of self bears to their love for others may not be the same. If we compare a man’s love of himself with his love for others, it may be said that he loves himself too much — that is, in proportion too much. And though this may be owing to a defect of love to others, rather than to an excess of love to himself, yet self-love, by this excess in its proportion, itself becomes inordinate in this respect, viz. that it becomes inordinate in its influence and government of the man. For though the principle of self-love, in itself considered, is not at all greater than if there is a due proportion of love to God and to fellow creatures with it, yet, the proportion being greater, its influence and government of the man become greater; and so its influence becomes inordinate by reason of the weakness or absence of other love that should restrain or regulate that influence.

To illustrate this, we may suppose the case of a servant in a family, who was formerly kept in the place of a servant, and whose influence in family affairs was not inordinate while his master’s strength was greater than his; and yet, if afterward the master grows weaker and loses his strength, and the rest of the family lose their former power, though the servant’s strength be not at all increased, yet, the proportion of his strength being increased, his influence may become inordinate, and, from being in subjection and a servant, he may become master m that house. And so self-love becomes inordinate. Before the fall, man loved himself, or his own happiness, as much as after the fall; but then, a superior principle of divine love had the throne, and was of such strength, that it wholly regulated and directed self-love. But since the fall, the principle of divine love has lost its strength, or rather is dead; so that self-love, continuing in its former strength, and having no superior principle to regulate it, becomes inordinate in its influence, and governs where it should be subject, and only a servant. Self-love, then, may become inordinate in its influence by being comparatively too great, either by love to God and to fellow creatures being too small, as it is in the saints, who in this world have great remaining corruption, or by its being none at all, as is the case with those who have no divine love in their hearts. Thus the inordinateness of self-love, with respect to the degree of it, is not as it is considered absolutely, but comparatively, or with respect to the degree of its influence. In some respects wicked men do not love themselves enough — not so much as the godly do; for they do not love the way of their own welfare and happiness; and in this sense it is sometimes said of the wicked that they hate themselves, though, in another sense, they love self too much.

It is further true, in the second place, that self-love, or a man’s love to his own happiness, may be inordinate, in placing that happiness in things that are confined to himself. In this case, the error is not so much in the degree of his love to himself as it is in the channel in which it flows. It is not in the degree in which he loves his own happiness, but in his placing his happiness where he ought not, and in limiting and confining his love. Some, although they love their own happiness, do not place that happiness in their own confined good, or in that good which is limited to themselves, but more in the common good — in that which is the good of others, or in the good to be enjoyed in and by others. A man’s love of his own happiness, when it runs in this last channel, is not what is called selfishness, but is the very opposite of it. But there are others who, in their love to their own happiness, place that happiness in good things that are confined or limited to themselves, to the exclusion of others. And this is selfishness. This is the thing most clearly and directly intended by that self-love which the Scripture condemns. And when it is said that charity seeketh not her own, we are to understand it of her own private good — good limited to herself. The expression, “her own,” is a phrase of appropriation, and properly carries in its signification the idea of limitation to self. And so the like phrase in Phil. 2:21, that “all seek their own,” carries the idea of confined and self-appropriated good, or the good that a man has singly and to himself, and in which he has no communion or partnership with another, but which he has so circumscribed and limited to himself as to exclude others. And so the expression is to be understood in 2 Tim. 3:2, “For men shall be lovers of their own selves;” for the phrase is of the most confined signification, limited to self alone, and excluding all others.

A man may love himself as much as one can, and may be, in the exercise of a high degree of love to his own happiness, ceaselessly longing for it, and yet he may so place that happiness, that, in the very act of seeking it, he may be in the high exercise of love to God; as, for example, when the happiness that he longs for, is to enjoy God, or to behold his glory, or to hold communion with him. Or a man may place his happiness in glorifying God. It may seem to him the greatest happiness that he can conceive of, to give God glory, as he may do; and he may long for this happiness. And in longing for it, he loves that which he looks on as his happiness; for if he did not love what in this case he esteemed his happiness, he would not long for it; and to love his happiness is to love himself. And yet, in the same act, he loves God, because he places his happiness in God; for nothing can more properly be called love to any being or thing, than to place our happiness in it. And so persons may place their happiness considerably in the good of others — their neighbors, for instance — and, desiring the happiness that consists in seeking their good, they may, in seeking it, love themselves and their own happiness. And yet this is not selfishness, because it is not a confined self-love; but the individual’s self-love flows out in such a channel as to take in others with himself. The self that he loves is, as it were, enlarged and multiplied, so that, in the very acts in which he loves himself, he loves others also. And this is the Christian spirit, the excellent and noble spirit of the gospel of Jesus Christ. This is the nature of that divine love, or Christian charity, that is spoken of in the text. And a Christian spirit is contrary to that selfish spirit which consists in the self-love that goes out after such objects as are confined and limited — such as a man’s worldly wealth, or the honor that consists in a man’s being set up higher in the world than his neighbors, or his own worldly ease and convenience, or his pleasing and gratifying his own bodily appetites and lusts.

The current formatting and editing are copyrighted by Jim Ehrhard, 2001. You are permitted to reproduce and distribute this material in any format provided that: (1) you credit the author; (2) any modifications are clearly marked; (3) you do not charge a fee beyond the cost of reproduction; and (4) you do not make more than 100 copies without permission

One of the greatest allegories of the Christian life is Pilgrim’s Progress. In it, John Bunyan deals with nearly every aspect of Christianity, including assurance of salvation. In fact, Bunyan ends his book in a most unusual fashion with the story of one named Ignorance.

Ignorance had met Christian and Hopeful earlier in the story. There they tried to converse with him about the nature of true faith and the need to examine himself honestly. But Ignorance would not listen to them. After Christian and Hopeful receive a grand entrance to the Celestial City, Bunyan turns the reader’s attention back to the character of Ignorance. Rather than crossing the River of Death as do the others, Ignorance finds a ferry-man named Vain-Hope to take him across the River. When he reaches the gate of the city, he expects to be granted entrance, but he is denied. In fact, the King commands two shining ones to bind him hand and foot, carry him to a door in the side of the hill, and put him in it. Then Bunyan ends with the most solemn of warnings: “Then I saw that there was a Way to Hell, even from the Gates of Heaven….”

Assurance of eternal life is important. Jesus reminded His disciples that on the last day, “many will say unto me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ but I will say to them, ‘I never knew you. Depart from me, ye workers of iniquity.’” Obviously many will experience the same surprise that Ignorance received when he discovered “that there was a Way to Hell, even from the Gates of Heaven.”

In Puritan theology, the doctrine of assurance was of vital importance.[1] “Of all doctrines preached by the Puritans, their instructions concerning the assurance of salvation may have prompted the greatest joy as well as the greatest misunderstanding.”[2] The Puritans believed that God had provided a certain revelation of Himself in the Scriptures and that revelation provided the means sufficient for one to know the certainty of his eternal destination. While one might think that the Puritan doctrine of election would lead to a carefree attitude toward good deeds, in Puritan theology, it often led to the opposite. The diligence with which the Puritans encouraged their listeners to make sure their calling and election, especially through the doing of good works, has often led many to wrongly conclude that the Puritans taught a salvation by works.

Indeed, many of these same accusations have been leveled against those, like John MacArthur, Jr., who have sought to return to a more biblical understanding of salvation and assurance.[3] In fact, D. A. Carson even frames the current “Lordship Controversy” in terms of a battle over the issue of assurance. He suggests that one of the primary concerns of Zane “Hodges and his colleagues is to make Christian assurance absolutely certain. To accomplish this, they tie assurance exclusively to saving faith, and divorce it from any support in a transformed life.”[4]

Jonathan Edwards, the Puritans, and those representing the “Lordship” camp have been certainly been misunderstood on the doctrine of assurance. However, rightly understood, the Puritan view of assurance would benefit believers today by giving them a more firm foundation upon which to base their assurance.

In their teaching on assurance, Edwards and the Puritans had two major concerns. First, their teaching on assurance was concerned with warning their listeners about the delusion of a false faith. In other words, their first task was not to give assurance to their hearers, but to cause them to honestly examine themselves to see if true faith was their experience. As an old spiritual says, “Everybody talkin’ bout heaven ain’t goin’ there.” In fact, a recent survey discovered that 99% of Americans believe that they are going to heaven!

This is because the Puritans understood what many evangelicals today ignore: that many who profess Christ have no real evidence of true faith in Christ. Thus, many of their sermons and writings were designed to awaken the unconverted parishioners within their churches. Their goal was basically two-fold: “to overthrow the confidence of the ‘legalist’ who based his assurance on his own good works and to demonstrate to the ‘professor’ how inadequate was his assurance which relied only on doctrine.”[5] They did this by encouraging professors to examine their lives to see if the fruits or evidences of salvation were present in them.[6] To the Puritan, a faith that did not manifest itself actively in life was no true faith but deception and death.[7] Thus, through many sermons and writings, they sought to call professors within the church to an honest examination of their faith.

Second, their preaching on assurance was concerned with helping listeners discover the genuineness of their faith. Their goal was not to shake up the faith of true believers, but rather to give true believers some biblical grounds for having assurance. They understood what modern evangelicals ignore: that some who are true believers lack assurance. Many of these lack assurance because they have never been properly taught about nature of biblical assurance. Others lack assurance because they have been taught to rely upon subjective feelings that are constantly changing and shifting. Most lack assurance because they have been taught that it is dangerous to examine their faith, when the Scriptures plainly tell us the opposite.

The Puritans helped their listeners to a greater assurance because they taught that the best evidence of a saving faith was found in the works of believers. Since true believers had the Spirit of God in them, they reasoned that there ought to be some evidence of His holiness in them also. However, they did not teach that a person’s works added anything to salvation itself. That was purchased and secured solely by work of Christ on their behalf. In fact, many of the Puritans warned against reliance on works as a reason for salvation and even encouraged believers to find assurance and the desire to do good deeds from their meditation on who Christ is and what He had done for them. Indeed, many of their writings and sermons sought to provide healing to “those who, in their pursuit of assurance, had fallen into a legalistic obedience.”[8] According to J. I. Packer, “A study of Puritan sermons will show that the preachers’ constant concern, in all their detailed detecting of sins, was to lead their hearers into the life of faith and a good conscience; which, they said, is the most joyous life that man can know in this world.”[9] The Puritans preached often about the doctrine of assurance because they were especially concerned that their listeners might be able to discern the differences between a true and a false faith and have confidence that theirs was a true and saving faith.

Edwards and Modern Evangelicals on Assurance

As we place the Doctrine of Assurance under the microscope of Jonathan Edwards, a few essential differences between Edwards and modern evangelicals on the theology of assurance emerge.

First, Edwards and the Puritans were careful to distinguish between salvation and assurance. They distinguished between the nature of saving faith, which was grounded in Christ’s work alone, and the nature of assurance, which could be discovered by examining the evidence of the Spirit’s work in one’s life.

To them, the ground of assurance was not a person’s faith, but the work of Christ. This may seem like a minor distinction, but to Edwards and the Puritans, it was major. While modern evangelicals place the emphasis upon believing as the basis for assurance, the Puritans placed the emphasis upon discerning whether one had truly believed. They were not adding anything to the finished work of Christ. Their question was not: Was faith in Christ alone sufficient for salvation? Their question was: Do I have that kind of faith?

They believed that salvation came to individuals, not because of what the person had done (i.e., believing) but upon what the Spirit had done in regeneration. They concluded that, if the Holy Spirit had truly regenerated a person, then there ought to be some evidence of the Spirit’s working in that person’s life.

This distinction is most evident especially in Edwards’s reply to the questions raised by a series of letters from Thomas Gillespie of Scotland. Gillespie had suggested that Edwards was dangerously close to leading his readers into doubt rather than into faith by his emphasis on the need to examine one’s faith for evidences of salvation. He replied, “I don’t take faith, and a person’s believing that they have faith, to be the same thing. Nor do I take unbelief, or being without faith and doubting whether they have it, to be the same thing, but entirely different.” In other words, a person may think they have faith and yet not be saved; while another may struggle with assurance and truly be saved. Modern evangelicals, like Mr. Gillespie, tend to confuse the doctrine of salvation which depends on God’s grace alone with the doctrine of assurance which depends on the evidence of the Spirit’s life within the believer. Jonathan Edwards’s careful distinction between salvation and assurance did not allow professors to rest in their profession if it had no works to confirm it.

Second, Edwards and the Puritans viewed the Christian life as a life of faith, not an instance of faith. Because modern evangelicals conceive of faith as “only a static decision of one instant,” there is a tendency to ignore any proper place for continuing obedience in the evangelical experience.[10] The Puritan view of faith differs. They considered faith as a journey or as a pilgrimage through which one could discover the direction of their life. A life of obedience confirmed to the believer that he was indeed on the narrow road that leads to life.

However, the Puritans did not deny the immediacy of salvation, as they are often accused. They believed that when a person was saved, he was saved immediately and forever. But faith, true faith, was not evidenced by any one decision but rather by a manner of life that indicated that the person was truly regenerated. Conversely, modern evangelicals put so much confidence in the immediacy of faith that they are quick to assure new believers of their salvation, not on the basis of any evidence in them, but solely on the basis of their making some one-time decision, whether it is praying a prayer or “walking the aisle.” Such ideas were considered “antinominian” by the Puritans. They believed that such an approach to assurance not only led to a life of sin, but also led many into an eternally damning deception.

This was certainly true in the theology of Jonathan Edwards. He clearly taught that salvation was by faith alone. But in an unpublished sermon on Galatians 5:6, Edwards clarifies this: “For tho’ it is only faith [that] justifies yet there is no faith that justifies but a working faith.”[11] Likewise, in his sermon on “Of the Perseverance of the Saints,” he makes it clear that justification by faith in the Scriptures was always a persevering faith.[12] The great question, according to Edwards, was not whether faith alone justified, but whether a person had a justifying faith. That could only be seen through the evidences of a person’s life. Thus, many of the Edwards’s sermons included explaining the Christian life as a pilgrimage or journey in which the person discovers whether he is truly on the road to life or not.[13] This is the same view of assurance was taught by other Puritans such as Richard Baxter who noted: “You may believe immediately …, but getting assurance of it may be the work of a great part of your life.”[14]

Edwards was also highly critical of an attitude that was gaining acceptance in revivalist America, which has gained predominance in modern evangelicalism: that a person can be given assurance based upon passages in the Bible. For example, some modern evangelists provide assurance immediately to professors by asking them to read a passage such as John 6:47: “Whoever believes in me has eternal life.” Then they ask the professor, “Have you believed?” If they answer, “yes,” then they are asked, “Then what do you have?” “Eternal life” is usually the reply. “Then never doubt it,” the inquirer is told. Even in his day, Edwards was especially concerned that some misused the word of God in trying to give assurance to new believers: “There is such a testimony given us in the word of God that he that believes shall be saved: But there is no such testimony in the word of God, that such an individual person, in such a town in Scotland or New England, believes.”[15]

Third, Edwards and the Puritans would differ greatly with modern evangelicals about the role of doubt in assurance. For modern evangelicals, doubt and assurance cannot go together. Modern believers are taught “never doubt your salvation” because they often equate salvation and assurance. The Puritans maintained a distinction between salvation and assurance. Some of them spoke of salvation as the root and assurance as the flower. It was the root which gave the plant life; it was the flower which gave it its beauty. A plant might live without its flower, but it cannot live without its root.

This distinction even led them to develop a theology of doubt as a means of moving toward assurance. Indeed, doubt in the believer’s life might serve as a blessing because it would cause the believer to move out of spiritual lethargy into action in order that his assurance might be established. Periods of doubt were not a problem for the Puritans as it is for evangelicals today. To the Puritans, a weak faith was still faith nonetheless. According to Thomas Brooks: “he that cannot find in himself the evidences of a strong faith, must not conclude that he has no faith; for he may have in him the evidence of a weak faith when he has not the evidences of a strong faith in him.”[16] Therefore many of sermons of the Puritans dealt with such practical topics as hindrances to assurance, difficulties in assurance, and steps to having assurance.

Beginning in November of 1746, Thomas Gillespie of Scotland carried on a series of correspondences with Jonathan Edwards over his concerns with what Edwards had written in his Treatise on Religious Affections. Gillespie was especially concerned that Edwards had placed too much emphasis upon works as evidence of salvation to the extent that believing had been minimized. Indeed he had even questioned the wisdom of a believer ever doubting his salvation: “It merits consideration whether the believer should ever doubt his state, on any account whatever, because doubting, as opposed to believing, is absolutely sinful.” Edwards’s reply was that “faith was greater than any one’s subjective feelings; and that faith precedes assurance, survives its lapses, and invites man to struggle for his assurance.” [17] That statement is, in itself, very instructive. Edwards notes that faith preceded assurance so that it could not be the same thing as assurance. Additionally, he recognized that true faith survives even though it has “its lapses.” Most importantly, he affirmed that it was faith that gives the believer the desire to continue the struggle for a more complete assurance. Such a view of assurance provides hope rather than discouragement to the struggling believer.

Indeed, for Edwards, each doubt that arises may be beneficial to assurance in that it causes the believer to a re-examination of his faith. That re-examination in a true believer actually results in a strengthening of his assurance. In “Religious Affections,” he notes:

when there are many of these acts and exercises, following one another in a course, under various trials, of every kind, the experience is still heightened; as one act confirms another. A man by once seeing his neighbor, may have good evidence of his presence: but by seeing him from day-to-day, and conversing with him in a course, [and] in various circumstances, the evidence is established. The disciples, when they first saw Christ, after his resurrection, had good evidence that he was alive: but by conversing with him for forty days, and his showing himself to them alive, by many infallible proofs, they had yet higher evidence.[18]

In support of his position, he also cited a similar understanding of assurance from the writings of Solomon Stoddard:

The more these visible exercises of grace are renewed, the more certain you will be. The more frequently these actings are renewed, the more abiding and confirmed your assurance will be. A man that has been assured of such visible exercises of grace, may quickly after be in doubt, whether he was not mistaken. But when such actings are renewed again and again, he grows more settled and established about his good state. If a man see a good thing once, that makes in sure: but if afterwards he fear[ed] he was deceived, when he comes to see it again, he is more sure he was not mistaken.[19]

Additionally, Edwards taught that even the believer’s struggle with indwelling sin was, in fact, an evidence of true faith. He believed that the true Christian was never entirely satisfied with anything less than being perfectly holy. For him, remaining sin is a great burden and he is not happy until it is removed. Those with a spurious faith would be little concerned with holiness and never struggle with sin. Thus, even the continual struggle with indwelling sin provided the believer with some evidence of true faith.[20]

Finally, Edwards and the Puritans would differ with modern evangelicals over the finality of assurance. For modern evangelicals, assurance is a thing that, once gained, is never lost. The Puritans would disagree strongly. Because they recognized the reality of indwelling sin, they also recognized that one’s assurance may waver at times. According to the Westminster Confession,

“True believers may have the assurance of their salvation divers ways shaken, diminished, and intermitted; as by negligence in preserving of it; by falling into some special sin, which woundeth the conscience, and grieveth the Spirit; by some sudden or vehement temptation; by God’s withdrawing the light of his countenance, and suffering even such as fear him to walk in darkness, and to have no light …”[21]

They were certainly not suggesting that salvation once gained could be lost; but assurance could be lost by failing to live close to Christ and walk in ways that please God.

Edwards’s Teachings on Assurance

First, Edwards taught that the experience of assurance was grounded in the covenant of God. Assurance flows out of the certainty that God will not and cannot reject his elected and adopted children. Though perseverance is an evidence of faith, perseverance in itself is not the reason for salvation. Rather, the perseverance of the saints is because of God’s faithfulness to His covenant promises in Christ.[22] The emphasis on such promises “provided solid pillars for increasing weak faith.”[23] But the mere knowledge of those covenant promises did not mean that they were necessarily applied to any particular person. Those promises were for all who were in the covenant; but how could a person know he was in the covenant? This question brings us to the second aspect of Edwards’s understanding of assurance.

Second, Edwards taught that assurance came primarily through the evidence of works in a person’s life. In the Puritan understanding, assurance could be gained by believers through two closely related, yet distinct, syllogisms—the practical and mystical syllogisms. The practical syllogism (or syllogismus practicus) emphasized external works evidenced in practical daily living. It could be stated by the following syllogism:

Major Premise: Only true believers manifest the fruits of sanctification and good deeds.

Minor Premise: By God’s grace, I see the evidence of such fruits and works in my life.

Conclusion: Therefore, I may be assured that I have a saving faith.

Conversely, the mystical syllogism (or syllogismus mysticus) emphasized the internal exercises or “steps of grace.” The evidence of true faith depended upon the internal testimony of the Spirit to the believer. Thus it could be represented by the following syllogism:

Major Premise: Only true believers experience the witness of the Spirit and godliness.

Minor Premise: By God’s grace, I see the evidence of such increasing godliness in my life.

Conclusion: Therefore, I may be assured that I have a saving faith.[24]

While Edwards accepted the validity of the mystical syllogism, he placed most of his emphasis on the practical syllogism as the best evidence of true believing faith. The practice of outward signs according to Edwards far outweighed the value of self examination. In “Religious Affections,” Edwards states:

Assurance is not to be obtained so much as of examination as by action. The apostle Paul sought assurance chiefly this way, even by forgetting those things that were behind, and reaching forth unto those things that were before, pressing toward the mark …”[25]

True faith evidences itself in practice. In this manner, Edwards’s view of charity is quite different from that of the medieval position, where charity brings faith to its fullness. According to Edwards, faith is not brought to life by our actions; rather faith is demonstrated by our actions. In his examination of the Epistle of James, Edwards held that Abraham’s faith was perfected or finished by his holy practice. His actions demonstrated the reality of his faith. Edwards even offers his own parable as an illustration of works perfecting faith:

“If a prince makes suit to a woman in a far country, that she would forsake her people, and father’s house, and come to him, to be his bride; the proper evidence of the compliance over heart with the King suit, is are actually forsaking her own people, and father’s house, and coming to him.”[26]

While Edwards did not totally discount the mystical syllogism, he remained skeptical of those who placed their confidence in it apart from the practical syllogism. His skepticism about basing assurance on the inward testimony came chiefly from four concerns. In the first place, he was aware that sin in the heart of every man blinds him to the reality of any real self-examination. Second, examination based on inward introspection can often result in anxiety rather than assurance. [27] This is because the affections are always changing and can sometimes mislead the believer into doubting his salvation because of an overly active introspection. A third problem with self examination is that it tends to lead the saints to spend too much time dissecting their experiences. The end result is that they are hindered in their actual work of holiness. That is why Edwards advised that the best way to a full assurance is to be active in the things of God. Finally, Edwards felt that much self-examination was mere self-reflection. A true biblical self-examination should not to be a turning into oneself, as much as it was to be the using of God’s word like a mirror to examine oneself.[28]

Thus, for Edwards, the best evidence of the work of the Spirit in a believer’s life is to be found in his works. In his preface to The Life of David Brainard, Serno Dwight notes that “[Jonathan Edwards] praised his friend David Brainerd for finding assurance of saving faith in its ‘evidences’ in his sanctified life rather than in immediate whisperings of the Holy Spirit.”

Third, Edwards was cautious to remind his listeners that the best way to assurance was not simply through doing deeds, but through drawing closer to Christ. This was certainly the emphasis of the English Puritans also. Richard Baxter advised his readers to

be sure that the first, and far greater part of your time, pains, and care, and inquiries, be for the getting and increasing of your grace, than for the discerning it…. See that you ask ten times at least, How should I get or increase my faith, my love to Christ, and to his people?[29]

Thomas Brooks wrote: “Therefore let thy eye and heart, first, most, and last, be fixed upon Christ, then will assurance bed and board with thee.”[30]

Likewise, Edwards did not point doubting believers only to outward evidences, but he pointed them toward a more vital union and relationship with Christ. In a letter to a young lady recently converted and struggling with some doubts, he wrote, “One new discovery of the glory of Christ’s face, will do more towards scattering clouds of darkness in one minute, than examining old experiences, by the best marks that can be given, through a whole year.”[31] In his sermon, “Christian Cautions,”

The way to grow in grace is to walk in the way of obedience to all the commands of God, to be very thorough in the practice of religion. Grace will flourish in the hearts of those who live in this manner. But if you live in some way of sin, that will be like some secret disease at your vitals, which will keep you poor, weak, and languishing.[32]

Suggestions for Discerning a True Faith

In this study, we have attempted to put the doctrine of assurance under the “microscope” of Jonathan Edwards. Since we have used a medical/scientific analogy for this examination, let’s continue to use such an analogy to provide some practical suggestions for directing people toward a biblical assurance in the spirit of Jonathan Edwards.

To facilitate a proper understanding of assurance, it might be best to call these evidences of eternal life “vital signs.” In the medical field, one’s physical condition is often monitored by the use of vital signs. Whenever an unconscious body is discovered, the first things examined are the vital signs to discover if the person is alive. In a similar fashion, the Bible gives us spiritual vital signs to provide assurance that we are alive spiritually.

Before we look at these, let’s consider four important facts about vital signs. First, vital signs are indicators; they do not cause or create anything. They only report the person’s condition. This is especially important when we speak about spiritual vital signs. They do not “make” anyone a Christian. Instead, those who have been born again by the Spirit of God have been made alive and therefore have these signs. Such an understanding is clear from the writings of Edwards: evidences do not save a person; they merely indicate that God has put spiritual life in that person.

Second, they are accurate. They leave little doubt as to the physical condition of the person. As you examine vital signs in your own spiritual life, do not fool yourself into thinking that you are on your way to heaven if the signs are absent. Just as a person whose vital signs are absent is physically dead, you are dead spiritually and need to be born again if these signs are not present. Edwards’s sermons which distinguished between true and false conversion often drove this fact home to his congregation.

Third, they are all necessary and related. Can you imagine a doctor arguing with his nurse: “I know there is no pulse, blood pressure or respiration, but I’m sure he’s alive because his temperature is not bad.” The body may have a temperature because it has recently expired – but it is still dead! Don’t use the vital signs as a checklist and conclude that you’ve got one vital sign so you must be okay. All the signs must be present in some degree for a full and complete assurance of eternal life.

Fourth, there is one important caution to remember when examining the vital signs: You need to look to see if they are PRESENT not to see if they are PREFECT. Can you imagine someone discovering he had a high temperature or high blood pressure and pronouncing, “I guess I’m dead after all”? In the same way, you need to look for the presence of these signs, not for perfection in them. However, should you find an area that is weak, this should be a warning that shows that, though you are alive spiritually, you are in ill health and need to take some corrective measures. This is why Edwards and the Puritans considered even a weak faith still as real faith. And this is why they labored so hard to show their listeners the means they might use to arrive at a more complete assurance of salvation.

Here are some of the signs that Edwards refers to in many of his writings:

First, A Love of Fellowship with Believers. According to 1 John 1:6-7, believers have two basic characteristics: they are forgiven and they fellowship. Those who profess to be followers of Christ that do not enjoy fellowship with other believers are to be held in suspect. The new nature of the believer leads him to desire to e with his brothers and sisters in Christ. In the case of John Bunyan’s Ignorance, unlike Hopeful and Christian, he “prefers to walk alone.” I would be deeply concerned about my salvation if I called myself a Christian and did not desire to be with other Christians. One vital sign of spiritual life is a new desire to be with other believers.

Second, A Deep Awareness of Sin. According to 1 John 1:8-10, another vital sign of faith is the awareness and admission of sin in our lives. Often believers are criticized as those who think they are sinless. However, a mark of true faith is that we come to acknowledge the fullness of our sin and flee to Christ. John makes it quite clear – those who say they have not sinned are simply liars. Believers sin, but they honestly admit their sin. In contrast, non-believers are always denying their sin, or minimizing it rather than confessing it. Therefore, one good sign of God’s work in our lives is admission of sin. John Owen noted that he did not know any believer to whom sin was not a burden and a sorrow. Richard Baxter said: “I think, if I could stand and mention all the other marks of grace…, it would appear that the truth and life of all of them lieth in this one.”

Third, A Lifestyle of Willing Obedience. In 1 John 2:3-4, the lifestyle of the believer is contrasted with non-believers. At first glance, it would appear that John is requiring sinless perfection. 1 John 2:29, 3:4-6, and 5:2 seem to echo the same. However, an examination of the context (especially 1:8-10) and the grammar (the use of a present indicative verb indicating continuing action) obviously lead to another conclusion. The passage is best translated with the idea that believers do not live lifestyles of habitual disobedience. Edwards clearly agreed with this assessment. We are not sinless, but struggle with sin and desire to be free from it. Such is not the desire of non-believers. They may desire to be free from the consequences of their sin, but they would like to hold on to the sin itself.

Fourth, A Witness of the Spirit Within. John speaks of this vital sign in two places: 3:24 and 4:13. Paul also speaks of the witness of the Spirit (see Romans 8:9, 16). What is this “witness” of the Spirit? It is not an emotional experience or certain spiritual gifts. The witness of the Spirit may be measured in many ways, but here are a few of the most obvious.

In Romans 8:15, Paul says, “For you did not receive the spirit of bondage again to fear, but you received the Spirit of adoption by whom we cry out, ‘Abba, Father.’” One mark of this witness is that we are now drawn to God and we cry out to Him as our Father. In Romans 8:14, we read, “As many as are lead by the Spirit of God, these are the sons of God.” This may indicate that believers are guided by God, but it most certainly indicated that they willingly follow Him (obedience).

In 1 Corinthians 2:12-14, we learn that a mark of a believer is a fresh understanding of the Scriptures. The natural man cannot understand these things “because they are spiritually discerned.” However, one mark of the work of the Spirit in a believer is that the Bible and the gospel which were once mysteries to him now make perfect sense. According to Edwards, the work of the Spirit causes men to have a greater regard for the Scriptures.[33]

Fifth, A Willing Confession of Christ. In his “Distinguishing Marks of a Work of the Spirit of God,” Edwards notes that the first characteristic of a true work of God in revival is that Jesus is confessed as the son of God and the savior of men.[34] The same can be said of the true believer. There is a new love for Christ and a new understanding of who He is and what He has done.

Two Cautions

1. Beware of Impatience. In 1 John 3:9, God’s life in us is described as His “seed” in us. The analogy refers to the seed of the male bringing about conception, but the similarities to a seed planted in the ground are also helpful. In both cases (the baby and the plant), one must give the seed time to grow before all the evidences of life are clear. If you are a new believer, you should expect to see some evidence of God’s life in your life. However, just as one would not plant a seed one day and uproot it the next because it did not bear fruit, so you must be especially patient with new believers and allow time for the evidence of life to grow.

2. Beware of Perfection. As was mentioned earlier, you need to look for EVIDENCE not for PERFECTION when examining these vital signs. Matthew Henry notes that the Holy Spirit usually changes the “affections and the attitudes” before He changes the “actions.”

One Warning

Beware of Presumption. Don’t take for granted that you are a believer just because you made a decision, had a religious experience, or are a member of a church. You must “examine yourself to see if you are in the faith” (2 Corinthians 13:5). Many have thought themselves to be saved only to discover that there really was no life in them. For Edwards and the Puritans, the gaining of assurance was a life-long pursuit, and one must be always examining himself lest he be found to be self-deceived.

Some may say, “Why should I examine my faith? I’m okay.” First, you need to do so because the Scriptures tell us to. “Examine yourself to see if you are in the faith,” Paul told the Corinthians. Those who are really converted have nothing to fear by an honest, Biblical examination of their salvation. Only the man-selling fake gold has anything to fear when a prospective buyer wants to have the gold tested before buying. Remember, the only thing worse than no assurance is a false assurance. What could be worse than to spend your whole life thinking that you were on your way to heaven, only to arrive at the judgment and hear Jesus say, “Depart from me, for I never knew you”? The matter of eternity is too important to go though this life unsure of your ultimate outcome. What could be worse than to be like Ignorance, ignoring any serious conversation about the true nature of faith and the evidences of assurance, only to cast away from heaven discovering too late that “there was a Way to Hell, even from the Gates of Heaven….” Let us be grateful for men like Edwards who directed others to the truth of the gospel and encouraged them to examine themselves so that they might find a more complete assurance of their salvation.

[1] Some of the best sources on the Puritan doctrine of assurance are R. H. Hawkes, “The Logic of Assurance in English Puritan Theology,” Westminster Theological Journal 52 (1990): 247-61; Geoffrey F. Nuttall, The Holy Spirit in Puritan Faith and Experience (Oxford: Blackwell, 1946): 34-61, 138–41; John von Rohr, “Covenant and Assurance in Early English Puritanism,” Church History 34 (1965) 195-203, and The Covenant of Grace in Puritan Thought (Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1986): 155-91; C. J. Sommerville, “Conversion, Sacrament and Assurance in the Puritan Covenant of Grace to 1650” (M.A. thesis, University of Kansas, 1963); William K. B. Stoever, ‘A Fair and Easie Way to Heaven’: Covenant Theology and Antinomianism in Early Massachusetts (Middletown: Wesleyan University Press, 1978) 119-60; Joel R. Beeke, Assurance of Faith: Calvin, English Puritanism, and the Dutch Second Reformation (New York: Peter Lang, 1991); and Joel R. Beeke, “Personal Assurance of Faith: The Puritans and Chapter 18.2 of the Westminster Confession,” Westminster Theological Journal 55 (1993):1-30, cited as Beeke, WC.

[2] Bruce Bickel, Light and Heat: The Puritan View of the Pulpit (Morgan, PA: Soli Deo Gloria, 1999), 141.

[3] John MacArthur, Jr., The Gospel According to Jesus (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1988) and Faith Works: The Gospel According to the Apostles (Dallas: Word, 1993).

[4] D. A. Carson, “Reflections of Christian Assurance,” Westminster Theological Journal (Spring 1992) 54:6.

[5] R. M. Hawkes, 248-49.

[6] Ibid, 251-52. “The Puritans did urge Christians to examine their works, not as a replacement to faith, but as a work of faith, to see God’s hand working within themselves.”

[7] Ibid, 253.

[8] Ibid, 252. See for example, Walter Marshall, The Gospel Mystery of Sanctification (1692, reprint, Grand Rapids: Reformation Heritage Books, 1999).

[9] J. I. Packer, A Quest for Godliness (Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 1990): 117–18.

[10] Hawkes, 253.

[11] John Gerstner, The Rational Biblcial Theology of Jonathan Edwards (Powhatan, VA: Bera Publications, 1993), III:226.

[12] Jonathan Edwards, The Works of Jonathan Edwards (Edinburgh: Banner of Truth Trust, 1974), II:596-603. Cited as Edwards, Works.

[13] See for example, Edwards’s sermon “The Christian Pilgrim,” in Works, 2:243-46.

[14] Conrad Cherry, The Theology of Jonathan Edwards (1966, reprint, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1990), 151.

[15] “Letters to Gillespie,” in John E. Smith, vol. 2 of The Works of Jonathan Edwards , ed. John E. Smith (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1972), 2:502-03. Cited as Yale 2.

[16] Thomas Brooks, The Works of Thomas Brooks (1861; reprint, Carlisle, Pa.: Banner of Truth, 1980) III:252.

[17] Yale, 2:470-76.

[18] Yale, 2: 452-53.

[19] Ibid, 453.

[20] Gerstner, 228.

[21] Westminster Confession of Faith, Article 18.4.

[22]One must be especially careful not to make the inference of Perry Miller: “The end of the Covenant of Grace is to give security to the transactions between God and men, for by binding God to the terms, it binds Him to save those who make good the terms.” Perry Miller, The New England Mind: The Seventeenth Century (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1939) 389. As Beeke notes, the Puritans were clear that the ultimate security of the covenant was in God’s sovereign grace, not in man holding God to any binding transaction. See Beeke, WC, 6.

[23] Beeke, WC, 8.

[24] A more detailed discussion of these syllogisms can be found in Beeke, WC, 17-18.

[25] Yale, II:195-96.

[26] Ibid, 445.

[27] Jonathan Edwards, “Christian Cautions,” at http://www.teachingresources.org/insights/EdwardsIndex.html.

[28] Jonathan Edwards, “Pressing into the Kingdom,” at http://www.teachingresources.org/insights/EdwardsIndex.html. self-examination should always be joined together with the reading of God’s Word:

“When you read or hear, reflect on yourselves as you go along, comparing yourselves and your own ways with what you read or hear. Reflect and consider what agreement or disagreement there is between the word and your ways…. Therefore when you there read the rules given us by Christ and his apostles, reflect and consider, each one of you with himself, Do I live according to this rule? Or do I live in any respect contrary to it? … How few are there who do this as they ought to do!” Edwards, “Christian Cautions,” op.cit.

[29] Richard Baxter, Catholic Theologie 9.138-39, cited in J. I. Packer, “The Redemption and Restoration of Man in the Thought of Richard Baxter” (Ph.D. dissertation, Oxford, 1954) 401, cited in Beeke, WC, 23, note 113.

[30] Thomas Brooks, Heaven on Earth (1654; reprint, London: Banner of Truth Trust, 1961), 307.

[31] Works, 1:liv

[32] Edwards, “Christian Cautions,” op.cit. Emphasis mine.

[33] Yale, 4:226.

[34] Ibid.